Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator
At 12:14 PM 2/19/96 EDT, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:
I would have appreciated it if you'd sent this to me privately, or at least didn't enclose my message to you (which was sent in private email). Among other reasons, it is rather off-topic (unless one wants to count it among bomb information available on the net). -Allen
Uh, okay, sorry. See, I wrote the response for you, and at the last minute I realized that I might as well include it to the list as well. Yes, it is "off topic" but I thought it was interesting reading anyway. In addition, I gave the list 12+ hours of "warning" and asked if anybody objected... All I got was an "attaboy" from Dr. Dmitri Vulis. As for the inclusion of your private note: sorry again. But at the time, it just didn't occur to me that you'd object to this. "Nettiquette" is new to me. Jim Bell jimbell@pacifier.com.
On Mon, 19 Feb 1996, Brian Davis wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 1996, jim bell wrote:
it just didn't occur to me that you'd object to this. "Nettiquette" is new to me. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > ^^^^^^
No shit.
So, it would seem, is nuclear weapons design.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com.
EBD
--- My prefered and soon to be permanent e-mail address: unicorn@schloss.li "In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti 00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
participants (3)
-
Black Unicorn -
Brian Davis -
jim bell