Oxley crypto update: vote in 90 minutes
Today's vote will be held in less than two hours. Keep in mind that this is just one committee out of five that's considering the SAFE bill. The impact of the committee's draft of SAFE is not nearly as important, IMHO, as the political impact of the vote. Can one of the nation's richest industries muster up the votes to defeat law enforcement -- in the //Commerce// committee, of all places? Many eyes will be watching the committee today. I hear that Oxley is nervous and has been calling people he never did before. His staff tells me that yes, he has been calling everyone on the committee. He'll be distributing letters of support from groups -- including law enforcement groups in California -- that will buttress his amendment. Oxley's staff tells me the version of Oxley II posted by CDT is almost certainly inaccurate and out of date. Solomon, chair of House Rules, is circulating a letter saying only SAFE with Oxley will go to the floor. The pressure's on. Rumors are flying that industry may cut a deal (perhaps brokered by White) that may give up civil liberties in exchange for export controls. We'll see soon. As of yesterday Oxley appeared to have a majority of perhaps 32-34 out of the 51 or so people on the committee. -Declan
In case anybody is counting votes, my own congressman (Brian Bilbray, R-CA) sits on the House Commerce committee. I just got a call back from his staff saying that Bilbray opposes the Oxley amendment and continues to support the original SAFE bill, which he co-sponsored.
Any other word on how today's vote is going?
Phil
A little more news: I've been told that the Bell companies have issued a statement saying that they remain opposed to Oxley II despite Oxley's attempts to bring them on board. This is good news -- the bell companies hold a lot of sway on the Commerce Committee and their opposition is politically valuable to us. I'd be surprised if the version of Oxley II posted on our site is inaccurate (it's dated 12:14 pm yesterday), but it is possible that there is an Oxley III floating around somewhere. Perhaps they are just trying to throw you off the scent. Solomon's statement that only SAFE w/Oxley will go to the floor is also good news -- it means that chances of anything passing this session are that much lower. More as it comes, Jonah (rooting for gridlock) At 2:02 PM -0400 9/24/97, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Today's vote will be held in less than two hours. Keep in mind that this is just one committee out of five that's considering the SAFE bill. The impact of the committee's draft of SAFE is not nearly as important, IMHO, as the political impact of the vote. Can one of the nation's richest industries muster up the votes to defeat law enforcement -- in the //Commerce// committee, of all places? Many eyes will be watching the committee today.
I hear that Oxley is nervous and has been calling people he never did before. His staff tells me that yes, he has been calling everyone on the committee. He'll be distributing letters of support from groups -- including law enforcement groups in California -- that will buttress his amendment. Oxley's staff tells me the version of Oxley II posted by CDT is almost certainly inaccurate and out of date. Solomon, chair of House Rules, is circulating a letter saying only SAFE with Oxley will go to the floor.
The pressure's on. Rumors are flying that industry may cut a deal (perhaps brokered by White) that may give up civil liberties in exchange for export controls. We'll see soon. As of yesterday Oxley appeared to have a majority of perhaps 32-34 out of the 51 or so people on the committee.
-Declan
In case anybody is counting votes, my own congressman (Brian Bilbray, R-CA) sits on the House Commerce committee. I just got a call back from his staff saying that Bilbray opposes the Oxley amendment and continues to support the original SAFE bill, which he co-sponsored.
Any other word on how today's vote is going?
Phil
* Value Your Privacy? The Government Doesn't. Say 'No' to Key Escrow! * Adopt Your Legislator - http://www.crypto.com/adopt -- Jonah Seiger, Communications Director (v) +1.202.637.9800 Center for Democracy and Technology pager +1.202.859.2151 <jseiger@cdt.org> PGP Key via finger http://www.cdt.org http://www.cdt.org/homes/jseiger
On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Jonah Seiger wrote:
I'd be surprised if the version of Oxley II posted on our site is inaccurate (it's dated 12:14 pm yesterday), but it is possible that there is an Oxley III floating around somewhere.
Like all language at this point, it's in flux. Oxley's staff says they were working on this through late yesterday afternoon. But I suspect the changes (if any) aren't going to substantially reshape the amendment. -Declan
participants (2)
-
Declan McCullagh
-
Jonah Seiger