I appreciate the thoughtful responses in this thread. Let me just make one point now, saving a more detailed response for this evening. Perry implied that I do not wish to see people avoid taxes, and that was why I was arguing that cryptography would not make this as easy as some had suggested. That is not a reasonable inference from my posts, and I am surprised Perry would suggest it given our two years of discussions on the extropians list. My primary motivation is of course simply to test what I see as a discrepency between the world I live and work in and that proposed in the crypto-anarchy model. I also want to question speculations that I see playing into the hands of law enforcement interests by making cryptography look more threatening than it is. Another reason is to discourage complacency that cryptography will solve our political problems by automatically ushering in a libertarian/anarchist utopia. This is a follow-on to the posts I made last week on this topic. Today, Sandy still says "We've won".

From my perspective, this declaration of victory is highly premature!

The postings about life in Italy did provide an interesting portrait of a society of tax evaders, but at the same time the government response was chilling. The U.S. is not Italy, and I suspect that neither the widespread tax avoidance nor the draconian government measures could happen here. But it should give pause to those who suggest that our political battles are won. Hal