Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)

on 20 Sep 1998 at 09:52:24 Reeza! wrote:
At 09:21 PM 9/19/98 -0000, Anonymous wrote:
What? To tell a lie is one thing, but ...[etc]
I understand you think this is persuasive, but I don't understand why. and then at Sun, 20 Sep 1998 15:26:05 Reeza! wrote:
You do remember from 6 hours earlier that we're talking about lieing? Your raising other issues is irrelevant. You're building up the bogey man. [Jim Choate recently described this method as a "Strawman".] I suggested there are things Bill's done that are worse. Are you sure you're disagreeing? Do you have anything worthwhile to bring to the discussion?
I guess not.
Reeza!
-- an anonymous aol32 user.

At 01:15 AM 9/23/98 +0900, Anonymous wrote:
Well, it seems I have an admirer. A follower, anyway. Quoting things I said from two separate posts. Persuasive, no. Revealing, yes. I believe the other issues are relevant. When a person micro-focuses on one instance of one issue, it is easily dismissable. That oversight, that disregard of clear evidence of malfeasance in many, and every area should not be ignored just because you think the issue should be simply (and only) one particular instance of, shall we say, hormone driven behaviour, to put it mildly. I'm not building up the bogey man, I'm discussing what I see. What I see, on every major and minor newstation, is a disgrace. A documented, public record disgrace. anonymouse, 32 bit aohell to boot. you must feel very safe. Yours is hardly the type of post that might necessitate the use of a remailer, so it should be safe to assume you haven't the courage to stand behind your words, even as mild as they are. Fuck you too. I suggest you discuss your lack of a spine with the maker. See the above for instructions to meet the maker. Reeza! "...The world was on fire, but no one could save me but you... Strange what desire will make foolish people do... (and the background vocalists sang) This world is only gonna break your heart...." ==C.I.==
participants (2)
-
Anonymous
-
Reeza!