Pat F A R R E L L wrote: / Subject line is bull*&^&, IMHO, of course Hey everyone has an opinion. In message Sat, 9 Sep 1995 16:40:00 UTC, an116512@anon.penet.fi writes:

to make my point: why is pat farrel helping the nsa and nist make

/Learn to spell my name. It is on my .sig, my keys, and in my userid. /We blockheaded, Irish Catholic Americans are damn proud of our name. /Farrell's (along with other cheap Irish labor) built the railroads /from Chicago west. Please spell it correctly, even if you are flaming me. F A R R E L L M O U S E

hey why not just write the escorw code for them!!!??? is mr farrel just being naive or is does he realize who hes working for? sorry to single him out but this is just an example of what im talking about.

/I doubt that this clown deserves a response, but... Then shut up. /There were a number of cypherpunks there. I can't speak for all, /but I expect movites include: /- attempting to clarify vague and confusing wording so we could /understand what they wanted. 'k /- seeing that working with them, rather than yelling at their stupidity, /has a higher chance of getting results. Beware of compromise, you become the rag puller for the rapist. / - we got to meet influential folks from industry who agree with us. 'k /- some of us aren't completely apposed to CKE. I think it has value. /If we could convert their plan for GAK into CKE, it would be a big win, /well worth the effort. Yea right. / - they are going to promulgate a FIPS PUB standard next week, whether I /like it or not, and whether I help or not. It is better to have that /standard understandable and clear than fuzzy and subject to subective /evaluation. Clear as any government forced standard can be. / - getting preposterous misstatements into the formal Federal Register so / we can quote it back to them in the congressional hearings. Mr Geoff / Greivelddinger's words should be handy to quote, for one example. 'k /- there are lots more, but I doubt that I can convince this clown. Then shut up.