Re: Another of Gary Burnore's Lies Exposed
Mix <mixmaster@remail.obscura.com> wrote:
:gburnore@netcom.com (Gary L. Burnore) wrote:
[clipped only the equine manure parts of Mr. Burnore's article ]
Hmmmm. Nothing left.
Isn't it amazing how the Anti-Privacy Mr. Burnore thinks there is only ONE anonymous person posting to correct his ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ outrageous lies and massive disinformation?
Uh, oh! Head for the hills! Our secret is out! We have all of these remailers and they only have ONE USER. <g>
Isn't it amazing how Dumbo Mr. Burnore calls 'an asshole' all those who choose to post a dissenting opinion anonymously? Isn't it amazing how Anti-Free Speech Mr. Burnore demands to know all anonymous identities yet himself hides the addresses of where he lives and works?
Most control freaks like Gary Burnore and the rest of the DataBasix Gang are hypocritical about privacy. They want to invade that of others at will while protecting their own. Gary Burnore and Belinda Bryan <eridani@netcom.com> were worried that their UNLISTED PHONE NUMBERS might be given out, but anyone who dares criticize their actions with an "unlisted" e-mail address is an "anon asshole". OK, let's make Gary happy. If he's so worried that my asshole is "anonymous", I guess I'd better give it a name -- "Burnore" sounds about right to me. So to all control freaks -- "stick it in your Burnore". I'm still wondering what wondrous plans Gary and Belinda had for all those e-mail addresses of the users of the Huge Cajones Remailer if Jeff Burchell had turned them over to DataBasux as they had demanded. (Not just the senders but the RECIPIENTS as well!) Fortunately, Jeff was smarter than your average Burnore and didn't keep such things around to tempt DataBasix, Scientology, etc., so we'll never find out.
participants (1)
-
nobody@REPLAY.COM