Toto wrote:

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:

...

These working examples also prove the other point I have found myself having to repeat... i.e. that anyone who posts to USENET news is trivially ``cullable'', and that E-mail spammers can have all of the E-mail addresses they could ever hope to use any day of the week.

Did you notice that when the 'censorship experiment' on the CypherPunks list was abandoned, that Greg Broiles called for the list to be 'killed'? Did you notice that when he was ignored, that he then changed his postition to suggest that UseNet was the proper forum for continuing the list?

Life is too complicated, ya' know? I just wanna know who is this PATTI SHOCK <shock@nevada.edu> person, who's allegedly calling for a moderation of some forum on Usenet. The way I see it, if she's a real babe, somebody should fix her up with some censored material just to keep her happy. Then just let some really mean, dirty material through once a month or so, just so she knows the process is working, and protecting her from all sorts of hideous stuff. OTOH, if she's a Chelsea Clinton look-alike, why bother?