Re: The Coming Police State
<tcmay> writes: >> prepared me for my later role as a hunted CyberFelon. ("Shockwave" is >> also credited by many to be one of the first mentions of "worms" in >> computers....though Brunner may've been talking to folks at Xerox >> PARC...wormly cross-fertilization.) and I digress wildly: Mid-November, 1988, after the great Morris Worm Stomp[1], a bunch of people who'd helped hunt the Worm were invited to the NCSC[2] to give talks at a "Post-Mortem", as it were. The MIT and Berkeley crowds had the most real technical data on it[3], though at least one of the government labs had done a fair job at decompiling it. The relevant part was that while the NCSC didn't have much useful info on the Worm itself[4] they had *categorized* it, and among their spiffy color slides, they had a "taxonomy" slide which surprised me by including Brunner's worm. The NCSC seems to officially credit Brunner as the first literature reference to the idea... Personally, I give the credit to David Gerrold, in ``When Harlie Was One''. Here's a netnews posting of mine that explains my reasoning.
Steve Bellovin cites David Gerrold as an early, perhaps the earliest, for mention of worms or viruses in computers:
Personally, I give the credit to David Gerrold, in ``When Harlie Was One''. Here's a netnews posting of mine that explains my reasoning.
From postnews Wed Jun 24 20:14:53 1992 Subject: Re: Viruses DO belong here! Newsgroups: comp.security.misc ... If we're going to use science fiction as sources -- and for terminology, why not? -- I'll see your ``Shockwave Rider'' and raise you ``When Harlie Was One'', by David Gerrold, copyright 1972. (Portions of the book appeared earlier; I don't know if this section was included.) Anyway, here are some relevant quotes. (N.B. I'm quoting the original version, not the later ``Release 2.0''.)
``Do you remember the VIRUS program?''
I have my circa 1972 copy of "Harlie" packed away, but my recollection of this issue (sorry, no citations) is as follows" * the _original_ version actually published in 1972 was an abridgement, by Gerrold and his publisher, of his original manuscript. I've read interviews with Gerrold in which he described how the section on viruses was _deleted_. (This is my recollection, from stuff I read around the time of the Morris worm, when Brunner was getting the credit for inspiring Morris Jr. and others, and some were citing "When Harlie was One." Like I said, my recollection may be faulty.) * He also did an expanded version (the "Release 2.0" Steve cited), updating the science and technology. This came out in 1988. * but I also recall Gerrold saying that before Release 2.0 came out, he and his publishers put back in some of the virus stuff into later _printings_ of the 1972 version, seeing the interest in worms and the like that Brunner's book had engendered. (This could help explain Gerrold's mention of a "science fiction author," unless he was self-referentially referring to himself.) If the virus stuff is in the copies actually _printed_ before Brunner's book, I agree that Gerrold deserves more credit than he usually gets. If, however, the comments came from later printings and cannot be found in pre-1976 printings, I think Gerrold cannot claim quite as much credit. I'll try to dig up my old 1972-3 copy, and will look in a used book store in Santa Cruz today for one. (And Bamford, too, for shipment to others.) Not that the fate of the world hinges on this.... --Tim May
participants (2)
-
smb＠research.att.com -
tcmay＠netcom.com