Re: Real issue of crypto controls: security or taxation loss?
as you say, Sun Tsu (from memory): select the battleground where you are strongest and the enemy is weakest. which is good advice. i recall Tzu also saying that you need to use the enemy's momentum to your advantage, the principle of judo if you will. in parallel, revolutionaries of many stripes have found that "heightening the contrast" is necessary if you mean for real change to occur. which brings me to ask, rhetorically i suspect, how we might heighten the contrast. i'd suggest delegating to some of us a support-the-bill effort complete with a detailed description of how the transmorgrified proposal that makes illegal all sorts of now ordinary acts. * you can't talk on the phone in a language the surveillance folk don't know (witness Compuserve's prohibition of Welsh on their otherwise monitored bulletin boards) * cryptographic door locks are now illegal without escrow (witness the SecurID-equipped door knob) * contracts that are transmitted over electronic means including facsimile must not be encrypted unless the keys are made available (witness the proliferation of safe fax machines) * no end-to-end encrypting cellular telephones may be used even if you are talking to someone in an otherwise hostile country (witness the formal industrial espionage of some countries) * passwords that map directly to encryption keys must therefore be escrowed (witness nearly everything but start with all the Kerberos derivatives including new NT stuff) * banks have to ensure that encrypted materials put into their safety deposit boxes are escrowed (sue somebody for the keys in their box naming the bank co-defendant for failure to escrow) * the attorney client privilege will not apply to my whispering my key to him/her, i.e., if i tell my attorney my key they are now my escrow agent even if it means violating the sanctity of the private conversation (witness i-don't-know-what but call Kevorkian to enlist him) * outlaw anonymous trading and the firms that provide it on the grounds that these represent encryption-of-names (witness the rules requiring such trading under some circumstances and the convention for others) in other words, shift the weight of who is radical to them. wrap ourselves in the flag deep within the big-government-sucks camp. march on the capital dressed as skin heads demanding the end of privacy for some sorrowful group or other. send the kind of letters that get you into trouble with the Secret Service but send them encrypted in Bill's private key (which you can issue him whether he likes it or not). mau-mau the flak catchers... --dan
On Mon, 15 Sep 1997, Dan Geer wrote:
i recall Tzu also saying that you need to use the enemy's momentum to your advantage, the principle of judo if you will. in parallel, revolutionaries of many stripes have found that "heightening the contrast" is necessary if you mean for real change to occur. ... in other words, shift the weight of who is radical to them. wrap ourselves in the flag deep within the big-government-sucks camp. march on the capital dressed as skin heads demanding the end of privacy for some sorrowful group or other. send the kind of letters that get you into trouble with the Secret Service but send them encrypted in Bill's private key (which you can issue him whether he likes it or not). mau-mau the flak catchers...
I like these suggestions on how to fight fire with fire. (Regarding the last one though, do remember that even just impersonating a federal official carries a jail term. Federal citizens have more rights than the rest of us.) Whimsically, I can imagine a coalition of dictators lobbying congress in favor of a key escrow policy. "Enciphered communications are causing us to lose our iron grip over our people. We must impose key escrow now, so that we can monitor domestic communications, and execute citizens who exchange undesirable political ideas." Regarding the struggle in general for free crypto, have faith that spin control should always work in our favor. Even if the entire government remains opposed crypto, the press should still be on our side. T Barber barber@ccrwest.org
Tim Barber wrote:
Regarding the struggle in general for free crypto, have faith that spin control should always work in our favor. Even if the entire government remains opposed crypto, the press should still be on our side.
Remember during Desert Storm, Saturday Night Live had a sketch lampooning reporters for pressing the military for information that would have been helpful to the enemy? And remember how right after that the press briefings tightened up a lot? And months later someone mentioned that the SNL skit gave them the courage to do it? The press is on the side of whomever is most likely to deliver the scoop that will elevate next week's ratings. If you can deliver a steady stream of story ideas involving sex, celebrities, and paranoia, the press will spin anything you want. -Dwight
participants (3)
-
Dan Geer -
Dwight Arthur -
Tim Barber