-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- At 12.12 PM 7/27/96 -0400, Alan Horowitz wrote:

...

Hello, I would rather I not be too blunt, but despite my generous interest in computer > hacking cracking, and other such related topics, I have come to be confused by the > mailer, can I ask any questions that I wish, or am I limited by some type of header > subject?

Shaun, let me explain. There's a committee of seven people. Me, Tim May, David Sternlight, some assination-politics guy, some guy named Vultis or somesuch, and so on.

Only if we're in unanimous agreement on the outcome of an issue, may you start a thread on a new topic. which then continues till the first posting which calls someone a Nazi.

And if they *don't* like your suggestion, you get killed and they move on to the next guy's suggestion of how to split up the available issues so that each cypherpunk gets a fair share of ranting. =============================================================================== David Rosoff (nihongo ga sukoshi dekiru) ---------------> drosoff@arc.unm.edu PGP public key 0xD37692F9 -----> finger drosoff@acoma.arc.unm.edu or keyservers 0xD37692F9 Key fingerprint = 25 7D AA 01 85 41 43 89 50 5A 33 76 F1 F1 99 67 Do you know who's reading your email? ---> http://www.arc.unm.edu/~drosoff/pgp/ Is it a forgery? --- I have PGP signed all email and news posts since May 1996. =============================================================================== "Relax. It's not a real alarm. They can't crack _Pentagon_ codes. Can they?" :p -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMfqXpBguzHDTdpL5AQHkjQQAoLcf75f6TcKCGUaoq0c1JiL+seDFgw2l LQNHY+P/coI8KmQeEpeZgdAVEmts+BNbhGfHSaHTFtyAoUP24OfRDyVr7Mn4d0gF 1wuDp4aVNtGAEMCVkg9dXL6Klf38NeglU1EH2522loYo6g6/ANiTdPX729KrMNMO 3iPydVCu0aI= =NhSg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----