RE: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks maiing list
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/35b3e39e46f59b68dc0cf59f60db3313.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
ichudov@algebra.com wrote>
Sandy also states rather plainly that crypto-relevance is not the criterion by which he moderates this list. I question this policy.
I would like to hear your opinions as to whether such policies satisfy the current readership.
- Igor.
I am not enthused about the perceived need for moderation. But neither was I enthused with the state of the list. However, I will reserve judgement as to the success or failure of the experiment for a while yet. The question for me is how much the moderation improves the S/N ratio v.s. how much it impedes dialogue. I expect Sandy to make mistakes, even by his own criterion. But anyone who will publicly admit to shaving his eyebrows is probably not swayed by popular opinion. James
participants (1)
-
jbugden@smtplink.alis.ca