Stay focused on the big picture
There has been hostility expressed on this list towards Limbaugh, 700 Club, UWSA, NRA, etc., and the 10's of millions of politically active supporters who could be allies in the anti-Clipper fight. In the interest of focusing attention on the big picture, I offer the following eloquent letter:
Mr. [Recipient]:
I'm writing to express my agreement with you concerning the dangerous, and in fact, tyrannous nature of the Clipper chip. However, I find your reasoning anachronistic - more typical of Cold War rhetoric than the new "paradigm" we find ourselves in now. In particular, I find it fascinating that many people, like yourself, are now beginning to see Liberalism for what it really is - an effort to cram government down our throats in order to protect us from ourselves. Thus the arrogant "if you knew what I know" attitude you mention in your article.
And simultaneously, those of you who were most hostile to conservatism are belatedly understanding what it is about - the virtue of LIMITED GOVERNMENT and INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY.
It seems, since the end of the Cold War, that new "battle-lines" have been drawn, and that you have discovered that those who you considered enemies are now in your camp, and that several old friends are now opponents.
Even now, you refuse to recognize the logical conclusion of Liberalism - government dominance of all facets of life, eclipsing individual rights. Instead, you remarkably tell yourself that BILL & AL are being hoodwinked by "spooks" in the NSA, but that they are really on your side. I have news for you, they are not.
After all, who is most likely to agree with you? Reagan, who says that "government is the problem" or Bill & AL who believe that government is the answer to all our problems - from the health care "crisis" to the dangers of vitamins. Clearly you can see now who is the champion of individual rights and who is the champion of bureaucracies that claim to know what we don't.
I invite you to the real new paradigm, in which old concepts of liberal and conservative are increasingly meaningless. It is a new world in which I - a conservative - find common cause with you - a liberal - in our fight for individual freedom. It is really debilitating and self-deceptive to cling to the old definitions.
I offer this in the spirit of cooperation, since I believe that if we hope to win the war, we should at least know who we are fighting!
Sincerely,
Robert J. Bork
Someone who wishes to remain anonymous wrote:
There has been hostility expressed on this list towards Limbaugh, 700 Club, UWSA, NRA, etc., and the 10's of millions of politically active supporters who could be allies in the anti-Clipper fight.
In the interest of focusing attention on the big picture, I offer the following eloquent letter:
Mr. [Recipient]:
I'm writing to express my agreement with you concerning the dangerous, and in fact, tyrannous nature of the Clipper chip. However, I find your reasoning
.....
I offer this in the spirit of cooperation, since I believe that if we hope to win the war, we should at least know who we are fighting!
Sincerely,
Robert J. Bork
Is this a real letter? If so, where did it appear? (I don't doubt the possibility of Almost-Supremee Judge Bork having written this, but the absence of "when and where" undermines its credibility a bit, for me at least.) I agree with the sentiments, and, in fact, Cypherpunks at the Mountain View meetings cover a range of political views and yet we mostly are in full agreement that crypto should be unregulated. --Tim May -- .......................................................................... Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@netcom.com | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero 408-688-5409 | knowledge, reputations, information markets, W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments. Higher Power: 2^859433 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available. "National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway."
FYI: This letter was written by rbork@frb.gov, someone at the Federal Reserve Board, who is not the Judge Bork you might think. This was an example used on pem-dev for why Distringuished Names would be a good thing. Personally, I think it doesn't make a difference. John Smith is John Smith, and just because you know that this John Smith works at Foosite International and that one works at Barsite, Inc., doesn't mean you necessarily know who they are, although it does help you differentiate them. (Then again, jsmith@foosite.org and jsmith@barsite.com differentiate them as well). Sigh. -derek
participants (3)
-
Derek Atkins -
nobody@soda.berkeley.edu -
tcmay@netcom.com