Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list
I don't think restricting participation to signed messages is a good idea until we have some way of verifying a signature automatically before allowing it to be posted. Here's one: How do you verify a signature for an anonymous, first time poster? I am not opposed to the concept, just I don't think there's a practical way of doing it. How about this: Require cypherpunks users to register a key and an identity, real or pseudonymous. Then, they can sign with the corresponding private key and nobody else can. The software then filters out bad posts. How do we prevent people from registering a key in someone else's name??? It's beyond me. Wonderer ------------------------------------------------------------------------- To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi. Due to the double-blind, any mail replies to this message will be anonymized, and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned. Please report any problems, inappropriate use etc. to admin@anon.penet.fi.
Here's one: How do you verify a signature for an anonymous, first time poster?
You don't try -- what would it mean? You accept the provided public key, and use it to check the continuity of the pseudonym.
How do we prevent people from registering a key in someone else's name??? It's beyond me.
The list, to check signatures, has to have a trusted key from each nym. But there are different sorts of trust. One might certify that a given key belongs to a known real-world meat machine. Or one might certify only that it corresponds to the legitimate user of a given net address. In theory, one could even certify that the key holder was not forced to hand a copy over the the NSA, or make whatever other guarantees one chooses. I think the trusting of keys should be left to individuals, who may have different ideas of what it means for them to accept a given signature. In PGP's "web of trust" model, is there a general consensus on what it means to sign someone's key?
Wonderer
Eli ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu
participants (2)
-
an41418＠anon.penet.fi -
Eli Brandt