Re: wealth and property rights
Adam Back wrote:
Steve Boursy writes:
That's a fair question. I don't begrude one's ownership of their fair share--but I do have serious problems with what we shall call 'accumulators' if you will. For them I have contempt and no-- they do not have that right of possession and often such 'work' is at the expense and on the backs of others.
I'm an accululator :-)
The investments I have I worked for.
Well of course you have--but the majority of people in the world that are poor have worked just as hard and do not derive the same benefits--that needs to be changed.
<clip>
See, if you spend your money now, on the above, you have no right to criticize me when I look relatively wealthy later. It's your choice to blow your money.
I agree--that's not what I was talking about--the majority of wealth is handed down not earned--and the ability to earn also more often than not results in hand me down priv.
I believe it was Thomas Jefferson who was successful at getting the practice of primo geniture outlawed in Virginia (it was later adopted by all the other states). He believed in a 'meritocracy' or sorts and abhored any practice which would create a merchant or political aristocracy in the new Republic. Unfortunately much of his wisdom was ignored (e.g. objection to a central bank, and the forbidding of one generation to indebt another) and we suffer the consequences to this day.
Btw, people of your mentality (communists/socialists) already make it very difficult for me to accumulate,
We do our best--some day we'll take it all away--really.
Steve
participants (1)
-
azur@netcom.com