I never thought the day would come when I would actually think that, however much I disagree with them, the pro-censorship people may have some small arguments on their side - but that was before I saw the sort of trash you continually spew.

Such trash should be an indicator to you of your -real- position on censorship. It is said that a supporter is someone who will say anything. Perhaps this is your position on free speech...a mere supporter? I invite your response to this question.

If you have something to say that is of interest, maybe you may gain some credibility. As it is, I won't be holding my breath, waiting for such a reversal of form.

The interest you seek is most probably only words of support for your position. Aiming at truth is always discouraged from those who do not know how to seek it. If you truly had any real interest in the anti-censorship position, you would watch your reactions to words which you yourself dislike, and attempt to understand what it feels like to want words removed from your reading selection by some other party. In this way, you would understand the pro-censorship position and therefore be in possession of enough real data to make a real decision as to which side you are on, if any.

Flames welcomed, from such fools as you obviously are.

No flames from me are appropriate at this time...but...when *I* flame you, you will know you have been flamed. I haven't bestowed that honor upon anyone in years, so don't get your hopes up.

~ Have you noticed that people who are most unwilling to accept ~ ~ responsibility for their own actions, are the most keen to regulate ~ ~ everyone else's? ~

Examples seem to abound on this from Dr. Vulis's selections from cypherpunks that I have seen. Granted, this is his bias I am also seeing... ------ Dave Hayes - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org Freedom Knight of Usenet - http://www.jetcafe.org/~dave/usenet Reporter (n.) - 1. A cat waiting at a mousehole.