Re: Limit on number of primes....a (stupid) idiot...
17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
Jim Choate is so stupid that even when he accidentally gets something right, he quickly "corrects" himself so that he is wrong again:
I had typed x/ln(x) as the asymptotic limit for the number of primes less than x.
This is incorrect. It should be,
x/log(x)
Wrong, doofus. x/ln(x) is the correct asymptotic limit. What role could logs to the base 10 possibly play? Do you think God favors the number 10? What a fool you are!
7590
Age (days ago)
7590
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Anonymous