Re: Int'l Money Laundering, Part the Second
At 07:31 PM 10/10/95 -0800, Douglas Barnes wrote:
When you combine these elements, you get a strategy that permits the US government to confiscate worldwide correspondent accounts of banks, even if they don't have a US presence.
This is doubtless one of the reasons why the US$ is rapidly losing its place as the preferred currency for international transactions.
acceptance of US-dollar negotiable instruments by a bank anywhere in the world outside of the US renders the bank susceptible to US criminal jurisdiction in the money laundering field.
| We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/ and our property, because of the kind | of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald derives from this right, not from the | arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
participants (1)
-
James A. Donald