Re: A glance at the future of missing child identification
At 8:52 PM 8/20/95, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
These transponders are already used for many year. They inject them in pigs and cows to identify them. And some car manufacturers put the into the ignition keys as theft protections.
The subcutaneous animal things are only detectable at very short ranges. Typically, a vet (animal doctor) uses a handheld wand to pick up the signal. Useful for tracking pets, farm animals, etc. There has so far been no known uses of this on humans, at least as a matter of routine. Possibly some developers have tried injecting themselves, for the usual reasons. The car system used here in the U.S. is called "Lo-Jack," as in the opposite of "hijack." I don't see how putting the transponders in ignition keys would do much to stop theft, but maybe I'm unaware of European developments. (There are keys with chips in them, acting as electronic keys, or to make the keys harder to duplicate, but not to track the cars.)
Technology is not new. Perhaps it is already used for criminals? Somewhere I heard that in America criminals are sentenced to stay at home because the jails are overfilled. A sender is attached to their leg and the police is informed if he leaves his home.
Yes, these exist. Not using the same technology as the transponders used in pets and livestock, though.
Perhaps a drug dealer may be more usefull if he moves free and has a transponder inside which he doesn't know about, that having him in jail.
Not technologically feasible at this time, but maybe in several years. Even so, it wouldn't be hard for his friends to scan him for bugs. Sure, some will argue that pseudorandom, very intermittent, frequency-agile signals could be emitted...I say it's a hard problem to escape detection by antennas a few centimeters away when the signal has to be detectable by surveillance antennas at least kilometers away, and more likely tens or hundreds of kilometers away. The infrastructure of antennas is lacking.
Here in Germany most department stores have big antennas at the doors which are normally used to detect thefts. Perhaps these antennas also recognize certain people. You can be sure even criminals go to department stores, undergrounds, or bus stations. Some hidden antennas and it's easy to be on their track.
Implausible. The theft detectors are not picking up specific transponders, just the "on" or "off" state of the things attached to clothing, books, CDs, etc. (I say "things" because some of them are strips inserted in books, some are tag-like things clamped to clothing, etc.) Again, the infrastructure is lacking. The simple detectors in stores would have to be upgraded to track more sophisticated transponders. The stores would have to cooperate, etc. Implausible. --Tim May ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@got.net (Got net?) | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero 408-728-0152 | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Corralitos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments. Higher Power: 2^756839 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available. "National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway."
In article <ac5d434c030210047d03@[205.199.118.202]>, tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May) wrote: }At 8:52 PM 8/20/95, Hadmut Danisch wrote: }>These transponders are already used for many year. They inject }>them in pigs and cows to identify them. And some car manufacturers }>put the into the ignition keys as theft protections. } }The subcutaneous animal things are only detectable at very short ranges. }Typically, a vet (animal doctor) uses a handheld wand to pick up the }signal. Useful for tracking pets, farm animals, etc. Yep, and it uses a nine digit number, what convienience. }There has so far been no known uses of this on humans, at least as a matter }of routine. Possibly some developers have tried injecting themselves, for }the usual reasons. Nope, those are in the works, well biotelemetry devices are. }Implausible. The theft detectors are not picking up specific transponders, }just the "on" or "off" state of the things attached to clothing, books, }CDs, etc. (I say "things" because some of them are strips inserted in }books, some are tag-like things clamped to clothing, etc.) They'll need to change those, kids are having too much fun attaching them to the innocent before they leave the store.. }Again, the infrastructure is lacking. The simple detectors in stores would }have to be upgraded to track more sophisticated transponders. The stores }would have to cooperate, etc. Implausible. The infrastructure is in place for the implantable short range devices all that is needed is a reader at a credit terminal. No, I don't see this as being implemented. Check out the pattent office for some interesting new devices in the works. One is has wide bandwidth outgoing channel and a low bandwidth incomming control channel. Range on the outgoing channel is 300 yards. This is through the skin.
"TCM" == Timothy C May <tcmay@got.net> writes:
TCM> At 8:52 PM 8/20/95, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
These transponders are already used for many year. They inject them in pigs and cows to identify them. And some car manufacturers put the into the ignition keys as theft protections.
TCM> There has so far been no known uses of this on humans, at least as a TCM> matter of routine. Possibly some developers have tried injecting TCM> themselves, for the usual reasons. Believe it or not, something like this is being used (or is being prepared for use) in breast implants. An article in the Houston (silicone city) Chronicle about a month ago (sorry, I can't produce a more exact reference) stated that new soybean oil breast implants are being manufactured to accept an identification device to track information on the patient and the implanting doctor. It's not exactly big brother (bigger sister?) but it's the first human-implanted ID device that I've heard of. I don't know if any have actually been implanted. --- Jason L. Tibbitts III - tibbs@uh.edu - 713/743-8687 - 221SR1 System Manager: Texas Center for Advanced Molecular Computation 1994 PC800 "Kuroneko" DoD# 1723
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello tibbs@sina.hpc.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III) and cypherpunks@toad.com and tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May) ...[about transponders for humans]...
Believe it or not, something like this is being used (or is being prepared for use) in breast implants. An article in the Houston (silicone city) ...
Is this what they call topic drift?
Subject: Re: A glance at the future of missing child identification
I can just see the parents getting their young daughters into this system. Boys, of course, can look after themselves. Sure. (Or do you envision young boys with breast implants?) ObCrypto: So, if they manage to make it more appropriate for both young girls and for boys, are there any counterarguments? (Not for c'punks, for general population: "missing children" will be hard to argue against.) * privacy (worth a try, anyhow) * use of the info by the bad guys (the mythical "pretty girl radar" :-) * "witness/victim protection" could be made harder by this * alternative: the transponder password could be shared secret between the parents and the state (what combination here?); protects both against perverted state and perverted parents... OK, what have I missed? Jiri - -- If you want an answer, please mail to <jirib@cs.monash.edu.au>. On sweeney, I may delete without reading! PGP 463A14D5 (but it's at home so it'll take a day or two) PGP EF0607F9 (but it's at uni so don't rely on it too much) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2i iQCVAwUBMEV3+yxV6mvvBgf5AQEIZAP9HHwlBOjyAjY8v5sQhvHywAXFhiPUuiI2 iPqEyDJ+GB4ZepDJsgzLaroxcEf/Gh72bgi6K8rk3EpqdErDePXa21Egy9Fw9tkm eFMY+YAOBLUO0C2thprTthVhlY194czoWuqvB2LXKwUyfV5w1CmvK0qQoO5+IVpL ZUuCIsjKssw= =qZnM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (4)
-
jcaldwel@iquest.net -
Jiri Baum -
tcmay@got.net -
tibbs@sina.hpc.uh.edu