It ain't over till the fatman burns...
Paul Bradley wrote:
I still am concerned about kids being subject to material that is inappropriate for their age group (what ever that may be). So how do I insure that my son/daugher does not get their hands on _THIS_ material?
Supervision, plain and simple. However, if you honestly believe your children are going to be harmed in some lasting way by any images they might find there is clearly something wrong with the way you have brought them up
Good, strong beatings will also help to deter them from doing things that they find interesting or pleasurable. This will help to reinforce the concept that things which feel good lead to pain and punishment. Pictures of people burning in hell can be put in prominent places in the home, with constant verbal reminders that God will punish bad people who have different values than you. It is particularly important to impress on your daughter that she must keep her head covered at all times and never look a strange man in the eye or allow her ankles to show. Remind her that, as much as you love her, you will still be forced to join in stoning her to death if she choses to stray outside acceptable social standards. Impress upon your son that if he wants to have sex with teenage girls under the age of 18 he must move to a foreign country where he can receive millions of dollars in foreign aide while he does so. Explain that if he has sex with his teenage girlfriend in this country that he is an evil person and will be convicted as a sex offender (which will delay their wedding plans) and be marked for life as a child molester. Most important of all, carefully explain to your children that if their gaze ever happens to fall upon material which you find unacceptable that they will end up being murdering, drug-dealing pornographers because they are immoral dupes with no character or self-will. Use Paul and myself as examples of where libertarian thinking leads, in the end. After all, he is writing from DEMON.co.uk and I am writing from LUCIFER@dhp.com. If you are concerned about what your children may encounter on the internet that will expose their lack of character and morals, there is a program available that is even better than Cybersitter. It was sent to the list by fuck@yourself.up a few months ago. Check the archives for it or ask the cypherpunks list's on-call librarian, Tim C. May, how to find it. FlameMonger
Supervision, plain and simple. However, if you honestly believe your children are going to be harmed in some lasting way by any images they might find there is clearly something wrong with the way you have brought them up
Good, strong beatings will also help to deter them from doing things that they find interesting or pleasurable. This will help to reinforce the concept that things which feel good lead to pain and punishment.
Indeed so: Lock and load!
Pictures of people burning in hell can be put in prominent places in the home, with constant verbal reminders that God will punish bad people who have different values than you.
This is a common and well researched technique, which, along with self flagellation, can be very effective for moral purification.
Impress upon your son that if he wants to have sex with teenage girls under the age of 18 he must move to a foreign country where he can receive millions of dollars in foreign aide while he does so.
I didn`t know the US age of consent was 18? Is this federal or state decided? It is 16 in the UK, not that any level is reasonable.
Explain that if he has sex with his teenage girlfriend in this country that he is an evil person and will be convicted as a sex offender (which will delay their wedding plans) and be marked for life as a child molester.
Indeed, prison violence by other prisoners against convicted sex offenders (ie. 18 year olds who have sex with their 15 year old girlfriend or just happen to accidentally pick up a 15 year old at a club, both henious crimes obviously) is very common in the UK.
Most important of all, carefully explain to your children that if their gaze ever happens to fall upon material which you find unacceptable that they will end up being murdering, drug-dealing pornographers because they are immoral dupes with no character or self-will.
Yes, the very sight of a naked woman is enough to turn any 17 year old into a raving killer with no respect for human life, of course, the moment he turns 18 it is just socially looked down upon, but not criminal, this is obvious isn`t it? Shouldn`t there be a law!
Use Paul and myself as examples of where libertarian thinking leads, in the end. After all, he is writing from DEMON.co.uk and I am writing from LUCIFER@dhp.com.
Yes, libertarian thinking is very pervasive. I used to be a minarchist, since thinking about the use of cryptography to preserve stable anarchies I have gravitated more and more towards an anarchist point of view with just a totally minimal NON-LAWMAKING state, ie. just a properly regulated police force, jail system, and the other associated bits and pieces, commercial methods, although they would be nice to totally purify anarchist doctrine <-(for want of a better and less overloaded word), just do not seem to work for these services due to the necessity for impartiality, the market DOES NOT want impartial judicial systems... It does not matter where you are located or who you associate with, or who you learn your life-view from, and how it develops. Proper logical libertarian thinking always leads to the same views, give or take the details.
If you are concerned about what your children may encounter on the internet that will expose their lack of character and morals, there is a program available that is even better than Cybersitter. It was sent to the list by fuck@yourself.up a few months ago.
I would recommend simply keeping all girls indoors in a cave until the age of 18, forcing them to wear a cast iron chastity belt, and arranged marriages. Boys can safely be allowed to go out fucking who they like after they reach 16, and not a day before, but do not under any circumstances give them proper sex education so they do not get girls pregnant, they must face the consequences!
FlameMonger
MoralityMonger Datacomms Technologies data security Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/ Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85 "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"
participants (2)
-
lucifer＠dhp.com -
Paul Bradley