Thanks all for the responses to the Cyhernomicon. Some people have begun to send corrections, clarifications, elaborations, etc., and others have asked me what _form_ such points shold be made in, e.g., should they list the "16.3.1" section numbers, etc.? So here are some points: 1. By all means send corrections, etc., as I said in the docs (the Release Note). 2. Include a *fragment of text* you are responding to. This will allow me to grep for the fragment or keyword and thus make the changes. 3. The section numbers ("13.9.1") are *NOT* useful, as they change automatically everytime I rearrange material. (By the way, I only chose to number the stuff out to 3 levels..."MORE" will do it to any number of levels, or mix in bullets, stars, Roman numbers, etc.) 4. If you think some points ought to be publically discussed, use your judgement and, then, go ahead and do so. Obviously I didn't intend the FAQ as a static, undiscussable document. (There are themes in it that don't get enough discussion, and that need discussion.) --Tim May -- .......................................................................... Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@netcom.com | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero 408-688-5409 | knowledge, reputations, information markets, W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments. Higher Power: 2^859433 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available. "National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway."