Patents and Trademarks invalid
Here's an idea: whenever someone uploads something like the RC2 source code, why not have everyone attach it to their .signature? Is criminal justice seriously going to pursue tracking down millions of people that did this? Or would they pull the plug. Food for thought (please don't e-mail me about this - I have enough e-mail already. Post instead)
Zachary Amsden writes:
(please don't e-mail me about this - I have enough e-mail already. Post instead)
I'm confused. Instead of you alone getting a copy of every reply, you'd prefer the scenario where you get a copy of every reply, and so does everyone else on the cypherpunks list, because _you_ get too much mail ? How does this scheme reduce the amount of email you get ? Are you not in fact subscribed to cypherpunks ? (I have no objection to everyone replying to the list; I just don't understand how this eases the burden on ZA's mailbox.) -Lewis "You're always disappointed, nothing seems to keep you high -- drive your bargains, push your papers, win your medals, fuck your strangers; don't it leave you on the empty side ?" (Joni Mitchell, 1972)
In article <199602161118.GAA10682@opine.cs.umass.edu> lmccarth@cs.umass.edu writes: Zachary Amsden writes:
(please don't e-mail me about this - I have enough e-mail already. Post instead)
I'm confused. Instead of you alone getting a copy of every reply, you'd prefer the scenario where you get a copy of every reply, and so does everyone else on the cypherpunks list, because _you_ get too much mail ? How does this scheme reduce the amount of email you get ? Are you not in fact subscribed to cypherpunks ? I suspect that he (like me) reads cypherpunks in News. Here at Caltech anyway the mailing list is gated into our NNTP news service. This is a big improvement over having mailing list stuff in your normal mail box. -Chris walter@cithe501.cithep.caltech.edu
participants (3)
-
lmccarth＠cs.umass.edu -
walter＠cithe302.cithep.caltech.edu -
Zachary R Amsden