Re: TLA abuse (?) [non-crypto, mostly]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bcd0/9bcd05f99f3c031d5206089a5eacd73bc4c59a5e" alt=""
David K. Merriman <merriman@amaonline.com> wrote:
Officer (sorry, don't recall his rank) Hughes says *he* thinks the models could conceivably be 18; a judge they showed it to said _she_ thought (personal opinion) younger. Hence, the forwarding to FBI for quasi-official determination.
Child pornography is illegal, however I don't believe that pictures of nekkid children are always considered to be child pornography (however much small-minded twirps want you to believe that they are). I know several "fundamentalists" who decry what our society has sunk to with images such as David's posted on the net for all to see. I take the opposing view, decrying the idiocy of declaring parts of our own bodies to be obscene. Unfortunately I don't see victory any time soon. Clay *************************************************************************** Clay Olbon II * Clay.Olbon@dynetics.com Systems Engineer * PGP262 public key on web page Dynetics, Inc. * http://www.msen.com/~olbon/olbon.html ***************************************************************** TANSTAAFL
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/440dd/440dd7c25383768692cde9f4d086d2f09a7db36e" alt=""
Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 18-Jul-96 Re: TLA abuse (?) [non-cryp.. by "Clay Olbon II"@dynetics
Child pornography is illegal, however I don't believe that pictures of nekkid children are always considered to be child pornography (however much small-minded twirps want you to believe that they are). I know several "fundamentalists" who decry what our society has sunk to with images such
The Knox case established that lascivious exhibition of the genitals (required for conviction) could take place when the kid was clothed. In that case, the girls were dancing around wearing leotards. I have my cites at work. -Declan
participants (2)
-
Clay Olbon II
-
Declan B. McCullagh