(Part 7 of 7)

The isolation works to reinforce their views, which in turn gives them new purpose.

Translation: "We think we have a really, really clever protoargument here for nullifying the right to peaceably assemble. If we can characterize the resisters as nut cases we can make the argument that they cannot be allowed the right to assemble because they reinforce each other's illness. Isn't that neat-o?"

This new purpose may take ordinary ideas to extremes, rationalize their problems into blaming government, and cause members to compete with each other to make stronger statements.

Translation: "Just as happened in the 1770's. We can't have anything like THAT happening here and now, can we? That was THEN, this is NOW! SHUT UP and SIT DOWN!"

Trend and Incident Reporting

If you become victimized by paper terrorism, contact the Washington State Patrol Organized Crime Intelligence Unit at (360) 753-3277, extension 121. All acts reaching a criminal level should be referred to your local law enforcement agency or prosecutor's office.

She never mentioned "Paper Terrorism" perpetrated by government agencies, did she? Would anyone care to hazard a guess as to the relative magnitude of government victimizing citizen-units vs citizen-units snapping at the heels of government by means of the tactics she lists above? 1,000-to-1? 100,000-to-1? Karen's definition of what constitutes "Paper Terrorism" is, basically, anything in the way of communication, court pleadings, cases, liens, etc. that the government doesn't like. If she wants to fly with a subjective definition then she can't very well argue against the subjective view of citizen-units who feel they are being terrorized by numerous and multitudinous, often false or frivolous communications, court pleadings, suits, charges, liens, seizures, convictions, sentences, fines, etc. Their subjective views are at least as valid as Karen's or the government's. (She's an elected ass-wipe, but she's OUR elected ass-wipe! If we want to elect someone on the Totalitarian ticket, that's our right. There's no law that says a Representative has to represent our interests.)