-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In article <199403242239.OAA00431@mail.netcom.com>, you write the following: MP> Hal writes: [ ramble ] MP> P.S. Is anyone worried that the Netherlands seems on the verge of MP> banning PGP? Wasn't this country once a hacker's paradise? They seem to be planning a law, possibly making use of the case that nobody is really interested because lack of knowledge. The government can suck my dick, if they want to throw me in jail for using PGP, well, let's go ahead. Patrick -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3a iQBVAgUBLZQSRJRymF15lPcFAQGtJgH/VPNOHhsf6r9qQimrttpLkddI286L78ns OXqinkVcWIHoA4t9YR2R2hPvvrVg5n63e7VQRjMbNh2Ni3sdYFRNLA== =b2gn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --- "In a Time/CNN poll of 1,000 Americans conducted last week by Yankelovich Partners, two-thirds said it was more important to protect the privacy of phone calls than to preserve the ability of police to conduct wiretaps. When informed about the Clipper Chip, 80% said they opposed it." - Philip Elmer-Dewitt, "Who Should Keep the Keys", TIME, Mar. 4 1994 == To get PGP, FTP /pub/unix/security/crypt/pgp23A.zip from ftp.funet.fi ==
participants (1)
-
kafka@desert.hacktic.nl