At 10:49 AM 9/5/96 -0700, Vladimir Z. Nuri wrote:

I have seen it repeated here often that somehow anonymity is some kind of a "right" that one should have in all kinds of different & important transactions, not merely on "cyberspace debate societies". I see here frequently the implication that *private*entities* that want to enforce identity in their own transactions are somehow implementing a corrupt, orwellian system.

We hold that private entities have the right to attempt to impose corrupt orwellian systems provided they do not do it at gunpoint, but we doubt that they will succeed without guns.

it sounded to me like that was all Dyson was advocating.

"Restrictions much stronger than a warrant" would imply that remailers would have to keep logs under penalty of law. --------------------------------------------------------------------- | We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/ and our property, because of the kind | of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald derives from this right, not from the | arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com