Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
Jim Choate wrote:
nobody@remailer.ch wrote:
Subject: Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
Presumably he should lie to protect the state.
Then don't take the oath:
To tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
...
So lieing per se isn't the problem.
No, it's the fact that he took an oath to tell the truth and didn't.
Murky water for impeachment, methinks.
Then you don't think very well.
What? To tell a lie is one thing, but if you preface it with "I'm telling the truth", then that is really really bad? I still think you're drawing a very fine line. I'm honoured to draw an ad hominem before revealing that I'm on AOL. -- an anonymous aol32 user.
At 09:21 PM 9/19/98 -0000, Anonymous wrote:
What? To tell a lie is one thing, but if you preface it with "I'm telling
then that is really really bad? I still think you're drawing a very fine
the truth", line.
I'm honoured to draw an ad hominem before revealing that I'm on AOL.
-- an anonymous aol32 user.
It was prefaced with "...to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...". Straighten out your head, you seem to be a few neurons short of a functional synapse. Reeza! The world was on fire,,, but no one could save me but you... Strange what desire ,,will make foolish people do..... (to the back beat) This world is only gonna break your heart.... ==C.I.==
participants (2)
-
Anonymous -
Reeza!