Re: airport security
At 07:16 AM 10/14/95 -0400, Bob Bruen wrote:
The US is merely trying to catch up to what the Europeans have been doing for over a decade. In fact, the US still has a way to go. You ought to pass through Heathrow in London some time to see what real airport security looks like. The US security changes are a recent response, starting after the World Trade Center bombing and being stepped up on a continuing basis. Today you need a picture ID to board with your ticket. Tomorrow...? We have lived in relative safety compared to the rest of the world, but I think those days are over.
I remember back during one of the previous FAA panics over terrorism. I was at the Portland airport discussing the measures with an FAA inspector. He explained why they had to have all the searches and stuff to stop anyone from blowing up the plane. I pointed out to him that if anyone wanted to do that, they would just lay off a line of mortars from the hills overlooking the airport across the river. He got very quiet and very worried... You cannot stop someone who is determined to do terrorist acts. And the more the government stomps down on descent, the more various groups will get pissed off and perform terrorist acts, which will cause them to crack down even harder. (And on and on and on.) They forget that the imposition of order increases the escalation of chaos. What does this have to do with crypto? Not a whole lot, other than it will be one of the first thing to be outlawed in the futile attempt to stomp out unauthorized communications. Gotta watch the proles every minute... "Welcome to the global village!" - Marshall "Number 6" McLuhan | Visualize whirled keys | alano@teleport.com | |"It's only half a keyserver. I had to split the | Disclaimer: | |other half with the government man." - Black Art | Ignore the man | | -- PGP 2.6.2 key available on request -- | behind the keyboard.| | http://www.teleport.com/~alano | <fnord> |
Crypto relevance: none.
I remember back during one of the previous FAA panics over terrorism. I was at the Portland airport discussing the measures with an FAA inspector. He explained why they had to have all the searches and stuff to stop anyone from blowing up the plane. I pointed out to him that if anyone wanted to do that, they would just lay off a line of mortars from the hills overlooking the airport across the river. He got very quiet and very worried...
Heh, one of our products gets a direct feed from the radar and flight track info and displays it on a real time screen showing planes, noise levels and other cutesy stuff in 3d. This sort of thing would be picked up and you could replay over and over the dot of the mortar hitting the plane, or a SAM missile coming up to the plane and both falling to the ground. Normal use is for telling off pilots for flying outside the environmental guidelines, or attaching resident complaints to flights but we have the odd scare sitting in the databases. Problem is (??) that since Australia has such high safety standards, we have to get all the booboo's from our international sites. Cheers, Mark mark@lochard.com.au
participants (2)
-
Alan Olsen -
Mark