nutty elf writes, from tower.stc.housing.washington.edu, the message below. If I'd been watching recently for postings from that machine, I could point out who he probably was.....

From toad.com!owner-cypherpunks@ig1.att.att.com Sun Jan 22 03:18:20 1995 Return-Path: <toad.com!owner-cypherpunks@ig1.att.att.com> Received: from ig1.att.att.com by anchor.ho.att.com (4.1/EMS-1.1.1 SunOS) id AA28663; Sun, 22 Jan 95 03:18:19 EST Received: from att!toad.com by ig1.att.att.com id AA09271; Sun, 22 Jan 95 03:20:16 EST Received: by gw1.att.com; Sun Jan 22 03:19:52 EST 1995 Received: from toad.com by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP id QQxzth02499; Sun, 22 Jan 1995 03:16:33 -0500 Received: by toad.com id AA25129; Sun, 22 Jan 95 00:12:52 PST Received: from northpole.org (tower.stc.housing.washington.edu) by toad.com id AA24523; Sun, 22 Jan 95 00:10:24 PST Date: Sun, 22 Jan 95 00:09:36 PST From: nutty_elf@northpole.org Message-Id: <9501220810.AA24523@toad.com> Subject: hmmm, port 25 To: cypherpunks@toad.com Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com Precedence: bulk Status: RO

That's strange, that last port 25 forgery didn't behave as expected. Just checking it.

--nutty elf