Re: Rumors of death of Anguilla Data are greatly exagerated.

Vince says:
And Anguilla is first and foremost a taxhaven. But it tries hard to be a very clean taxhaven (does not want drug money etc). I think that "clean" corporations operating here tax free is a potentially huge market.
This is an illusion. There ain't no such thing as a clean corporation operating in a clean tax haven. Every overseas corp that is doing something they can't do without interference back onshore, is running the gauntlet. Remember, its my moral choice as to whether its dirty, and if I am sitting in some Washington quango office, and I decide its dirty, then it is. Plus its my job to fight it, and I'm not afraid of a dirty fight. And I got a list of contacts who've got friends who've got favours to call in... But you must know this, don't you follow the machinations that USG pulls in the region to try and close down the arbitrages?
Anguilla and OIS are not the data haven of cypherpunks wet dreams. Neither Anguilla nor I want "hit men for hire" advertising here. Sorry Tim. And I think the loss in clean business would outweigh any money from such by a long shot.
Nobody's talking about things that every body agrees are no-go. Shooting people is generally considered not acceptable. So please don't change the subject. What we are talking about is a fairly harmless concept. An obviously "fake" passport that is designed to fool the supposedly ignorant peasant terrorist when they wave grenades on the some flight from Miami, now going to Havana. It's a laughable concept, and one that most western governments have sniffed at and not lifted one finger to even warn about. OK, so there is a chance that a dumb clerk in a bank could be fooled. Still, opening a bank account with such a person could be done any number of ways. It's equally possible to imagine the Honduras passport being used to escape some sudaka warzone, without being shot for a gringo. Remember PGP? It was used for liberty, crime and freedom, all at once.
One simple example is that OIS was given a project Gutenberg CD-ROM and may sell online copies of old books. Some countries are extending copyrights back further into the past. Anguilla is not. So we could sell books that have expired copyrights in Anguilla but not expired in USA etc. Think regulatory arbitrage.
Crap. It's obvious what book your talking about, if you get Europeans down there. It's about as harmless, or harmful, as "kill the Queen" rants, again its my moral choice. If a phone call from your lawyer causes such good responses, then there is no problem about getting this one made out-of-stock. Do you have a lot of tourists then from *that* place? What's the GDP take for the holiday trade anyway?
Taxhavens are a huge and well understood market. Datahavens are still new. Not counting gambling, they may only be $0/year rounded to the nearest million.
The distinction is irrelevant. What are you going to do to protect my business? Now I know. SFA. I may be asking you for data protection, but my profits, which (might) pay you, come from a long line of other businesses. We're not all geeks. Tim makes good points, especially as he is not (as far as I can see) in the trade. When my company does business with such a jurisdiction, we look for the list of things allowed and the list of no-nos (which we respect). Then we look at the history of how that country stand up to its word. One thing is what they say, then another is what they do. It's surprising how easy it is to see just how much a place really wants your business for the long run. I will say this, it ain't really your fault that this happened. The webshop was too bright, too blatent. He talked to toublesome scam reporters. That sort of thing is going to bring in trouble. Softly softly catchee monkey is what is needed. Then when the phone rang my guess is it all happened to quickly. You win some you lose some. Lets not make a bad story get worse. Even though this is not a happy post (Anguilla was on our list) we still would like you to suceed. Our advice, worth what you paid, is don't advertise this event, one bad storm doesnt sink a ship. Take a look at all your webpages and tone down the noisy ones. Tell them to camoflage their location, no pun intended. Then, get down to your lawyers office and sit down over a beer and work out how your going to handle this thing next time. Properly. Publish (quietly but definatively) your list of no-nos (ok, that's already said). Think about what new shops want to do and talk it over with your man down at the bar (so you can predict the attacks). Learn some negotiating skills, soften the blow from both ends. Nothing I'm sure you hadn't thought of. Cheers, sorry for anonymity, but as I say, its softly softly in this game. Wish you luck. --****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--***ATTENTION*** Your e-mail reply to this message WILL be *automatically* ANONYMIZED. Please, report inappropriate use to abuse@anon.penet.fi For information (incl. non-anon reply) write to help@anon.penet.fi If you have any problems, address them to admin@anon.penet.fi

At 6:51 PM -0400 8/12/96, Vince wrote:
Many fortune 500 companies have offshore corporations for "self insurance". Many many movies have corporations offshore just for that movie. These are type of "clean" corporations that taxhavens like.
George Soros' Quantum Fund is an "NV" corporation, domiciled in the Netherlands Antilles, for instance. We went over this about two years ago, but the original ;-) connotation of "e$" was eurodollar, or expatriate dollars held outside the US banking system. For a decade or so, maybe still, this was an excellent way to raise money for US corporations. Most of the Fortune XX companies did this stuff, and probably still do, all to avoid Uncle's sticky fingers. While we may be talking about something else here entirely :-), remember that tax avoidance is not necessarily tax evasion. And, of course, jurisdiction shopping ("regulatory arbitrage") isn't necessarily breaking the law. Cheers, Bob Hettinga ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com) e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "'Bart Bucks' are not legal tender." -- Punishment, 100 times on a chalkboard, for Bart Simpson The e$ Home Page: http://www.vmeng.com/rah/

And Anguilla is first and foremost a taxhaven. But it tries hard to be a very clean taxhaven (does not want drug money etc). I think that "clean" corporations operating here tax free is a potentially huge market.
This is an illusion. There ain't no such thing as a clean corporation operating in a clean tax haven. Every overseas corp that is doing something they can't do without interference back onshore, is running the gauntlet.
In taxhaven industry jargon, "clean" means they are avoiding taxes only. No drugs, no money laundering, no violent crime, no stolen money, no fraud. Many fortune 500 companies have offshore corporations for "self insurance". Many many movies have corporations offshore just for that movie. These are type of "clean" corporations that taxhavens like. -- Vince
participants (3)
-
an584514@anon.penet.fi
-
Robert Hettinga
-
Vince