Response to Perrygram
At 6:33 PM 2/13/96, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
Tim, you don't work for a living. Some of us do. You might try to think back and remember what it was like in the days when you still did something every once in a while and had a limited amount of time ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ available in which to do it.
Perry once again resorts to insults. Constantly belittling the efforts of others suggests deepseated psychological doubts about his own contributions. Shows you the reaction I get for even responding to him. My mistake. Perry should learn how to use mail filters, then he can simply filter out all the stuff he doesn't want to see. Or, simply hitting the 'delete" key in whatever reader he is using...surely typing "D" 20 or 30 times a day takes far less time than writing one of his perrygrams? --Tim May Boycott espionage-enabled software! We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed. ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^756839 - 1 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
Timothy C. May writes:
Perry once again resorts to insults. Constantly belittling the efforts of others suggests deepseated psychological doubts about his own contributions.
I have no deep seated psychological doubts about my own contributions. I do, however, have a deep seated dislike for people who wish to demonstrate their "freedom" by posting anything they like wherever they like. Sure, you are "free" to do that, just like you are "free" to burn down your own house, insult all your friends, or anything else that isn't socially worthwhile. You have to ask, though, if these are things in your interest or that will improve the world. I will repeat, Tim. You have no job and do nothing for a living. For you it is probably hard to understand that some of us prefer to get our mail segregated by topic so that we don't have to spend more time than needed reading our email. However, for some of us, time is money. I have failed to directly answer your comments on this sort of thing out of deference to your "elder statesman" status around here, but this is getting silly. If you want to post about libertarianism, libernet, so far as I know, still takes postings. If you want to read about the habits of migrating birds, there are interest groups for that. We don't have a lot of good places to discuss specifically cryptography and its impact, and this group was set up *for that*. I mean, why not just have one mailing list for all topics of all sorts if "filtering" and "hitting the 'd' key" are supposed to be the only way we deal with this stuff, hmm? Perry
On Tue, 13 Feb 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:
At 6:33 PM 2/13/96, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
Tim, you don't work for a living. Some of us do. You might try to think back and remember what it was like in the days when you still did something every once in a while and had a limited amount of time ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ available in which to do it.
Perry once again resorts to insults. Constantly belittling the efforts of others suggests deepseated psychological doubts about his own contributions.
Shows you the reaction I get for even responding to him. My mistake.
Perry should learn how to use mail filters, then he can simply filter out all the stuff he doesn't want to see. Or, simply hitting the 'delete" key in whatever reader he is using...surely typing "D" 20 or 30 times a day takes far less time than writing one of his perrygrams?
Am I the only one who thinks that big money could be made selling tickets for a first class section in which Mr. Metzger and Mr. May were seated in 2a and 2b? How about the video rights? Would you two consider a show featuring the pair? Cyphercrosstalk? Crosspunks? --- My prefered and soon to be permanent e-mail address: unicorn@schloss.li "In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti 00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
participants (3)
-
Black Unicorn -
Perry E. Metzger -
tcmay@got.net