You want to read MY e-mail?

from the Nando Times- DENVER (Jan 20, 1996 01:16 a.m. EST) -- A college student's request to look at the electronic mail of several high-profile state politicians got lawmakers' attention Friday. Becky O'Guin, a senior journalism student at Metropolitan State College of Denver and a reporter for The Capitol Reporter, a student newspaper that covers legislative action, stirred up the ruckus. She sent a letter to Sen. Charles Duke, R-Monument, asking for all of his e-mail messages from Jan. 1 to Jan. 16 and cited the Colorado Open Records Act as her right to get it. The letter noted that Colorado law would force him to pay court costs and attorney fees if a member of the public "has to take official action to enforce his or her right to view a public record." That really miffed legislators. Lawmakers said they'd get a legal opinion on whether they must disclose their electronic-age messages and may pass legislation to make sure their messages have some protection of privacy. Senate Majority Leader Jeff Wells, R-Colorado Springs, said he and Senate President Tom Norton, R-Greeley, got similar requests, but verbally. Personally, Wells said, he believes e-mail is privileged information unless it is specifically identified as public information under existing law. A bill by Sen. Paul Weissmann, R-Louisville, to make e-mail as privileged as telephone conversations was killed in a Senate committee. A somewhat stronger bill still rests in the House. O'Guin, meanwhile, was standing her ground, although she admitted to being a little surprised about the uproar. "The way I read the open records statute, those are open records," O'Guin said. "I was very serious about the request. What I was looking for was to find out how much public business is conducted through e-mail. "If they're using e-mail to send memos back and forth discussing public business, I see that as public record," she said. "Most of them don't (have e-mail), but about 30 people have software that allows them to send e-mail back and forth." She said only Duke and Gov. Roy Romer have been sent letters so far, but she intends to send them to other high-profile politicians. Jim Carpenter, press secretary for Romer, said his office was "looking at all the issues, all the options." Duke said he has always complied with requests for public records, but said the request for e- mail messages goes too far. "I'm disturbed by it," Duke said. (John Sanko writes for the Rocky Mountain News in Denver.) OK, if _I_ can't read your e-mail Mr. Legislator, why should you be able to read _mine_? - --scottst@ionet.net---------------------Scott Staedeli--
~<^xXx | "There is no reason for any indiv- xX # | idual to have a computer in their (XXX) # | home." (XXXXXXX) | DON'T TREAD ON ME| -- Ken Olsen, president of DEC, 1977 ========================================================

On Sat, 20 Jan 1996, Scott Staedeli wrote:
from the Nando Times-
DENVER (Jan 20, 1996 01:16 a.m. EST) -- A college student's request to look at the electronic mail of several high-profile state politicians got lawmakers' attention Friday.
... OK, if _I_ can't read your e-mail Mr. Legislator, why should you be able to read _mine_?
The Colorado state legislature has nothing to do with federal wiretapping laws and with federal laws relating to encryption. Rather than the "government is inconsistent and bad" spin, why not "Colorado legislators and the Colorado governor agree that privacy is paramount in electronic communications. In opposing a request for blanket access to their private electronic mail, they necessarily oppose federal attempts to have access to all electronic mail, once again showing that Washington is out of touch with the rest of the country. Parts of the federal government are catching on, however. The U.S. Commerce Department recently agreed that federal attempts to eavesdrop on electronic transmissions counterproductive in that they are causing problems for U.S. companies which create computer programs designed to allow secure use of the Internet to engage in private discussions and secure commerce. Estimates the dollar value of exports lost range up to $xxx, and continued chilling of U.S. programmers will give foreign programmers the chance to catch up in a field where U.S. expertise presently leads the world. ...." Needs to be re-written and juiced up, but you get the idea. Have at it, Sameer. EBD
participants (2)
-
Brian Davis
-
Scott Staedeli