I see the introduction of common, publicly promoted cryptography as a *GOOD* thing... even if it's insecure. Yes, even if the government can read every toggled bit of it. If the public uses cryptography of even the simplest sort as a matter of routine then the *REAL* cryptography, the really *SECURE* stuff, will pass through unnoticed. Why would *I* care if some super-secret agency could read my clipper'd data? I'd be using PGP on top of it! only then my messages wouldn't stand out like so many lights in a dark night... ...more like just a few more stars in the sky. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi. Due to the double-blind, any mail replies to this message will be anonymized, and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned. Please report any problems, inappropriate use etc. to admin@anon.penet.fi.