How irritating are anon encrypted pgp messages
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is something I have been wondering about for a while: How rude is it for people to post (or mail to a mailing list) anon messages encrypted with someone's PGP key? It makes it easy for the receiver to obtain it, but how irritating is it to people? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAgUBLfx6cXDkimqwdwa5AQE5PgQAr7vFwaMiKhAcdUqQW1B85W+nehSYUp47 iyL1cREjD2yypC9XnAkzucCAAie9so1fY74KQwQhWS99h9oMn/QWEUT50OBhVX8+ Mt98Tpr2/9pf2ovlvmqTtkyEC7DY38tsBmbYcRvwyZ1/6Dlvs4gJtmwtwwhW3UDj +pQFp+GSv+4= =jGCF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Personally, I don't like them. I can see that there are times when someone would not want anyone to know what the recipient's email address is, but it is just more noise to filter for everyone else. I'm on several other mailing lists, so I already filter through a couple of hundred messages a day. What makes it worse is that they are *all* downloaded to my Duo before filtration begins. The last thing I want is more disk space eaten up for off topic messages, and I can't think anything more off topic than messages no one can read. Just my two cents worth. jpb
Joseph Block writes:
Personally, I don't like them. I can see that there are times when someone would not want anyone to know what the recipient's email address is, but it is just more noise to filter for everyone else. I'm on several other mailing
The situation here is that _sender_ does not know the e-mail address of the recipient! Whether these messages are a good thing or not is a different issue, but the fact is that what are seeing here is the use of the Cypherpunks mailing list as a "message pool." --Tim May -- .......................................................................... Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@netcom.com | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero 408-688-5409 | knowledge, reputations, information markets, W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments. Higher Power: 2^859433 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available. "National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway."
Tim writes:
I wrote:
Personally, I don't like them. I can see that there are times when someone would not want anyone to know what the recipient's email address is, but it is just more noise to filter for everyone else. I'm on several other mailing
The situation here is that _sender_ does not know the e-mail address of the recipient!
Whether these messages are a good thing or not is a different issue, but the fact is that what are seeing here is the use of the Cypherpunks mailing list as a "message pool."
If there is demand for this, someone should set up a message pool list, not use cypherpunks. If there was a pool list, I'm sure it would get traffic.
participants (3)
-
dfloyd＠runner.utsa.edu -
Joseph Block -
tcmay＠netcom.com