Re: FW: Now we have it all
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ef6e/7ef6e231d209e5db6c1e70a77c5e7dc402a900f5" alt=""
17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
6:17 p.m.
X-Sender: tcmay@mail.got.net Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 10:04:52 -0800 To: CYPHERPUNKS@toad.com From: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net> Subject: Re: FW: Now we have it all Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
At 10:47 AM +0100 11/6/96, Butler, Scott wrote:
Abaddon wrote:
susbscribe
Surely we have seen it all now. I find it hard to believe that a word like suscribe....subsribe....subcribes.. SUBSCRIBE..is so difficult to spell correctly.
:-)
This is actually steganography. Various spellings of "subscribe" are being used to communicate a bit or two per message.
Actually, the practice becomes a code, as in:
"Suscrive if by sea, sudcribe if by land."
--Klaus! von Future Prime
Please unsubscribe me from your list
Hendra
7743
Age (days ago)
7743
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Hendra Halim