Please remove dpeterson@jonescyber.com from your mailing list. He is no longer at this company. -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Lynn Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 1997 2:46 PM To: Montgomery, Lynn Subject: Notification: Inbound Mail Failure The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. A NDR was not sent to the originator for the following recipients for one of the following reasons: * The Delivery Status Notification options did not request failure notification, or requested no notification. * The message was of precedence bulk. NDR reasons are listed with each recipient, along with the notification requested for that recipient, or the precedence. <dpeterson@jonescyber.com> dpeterson@jonescyber.com MSEXCH:IMS:JONES:CORPORATE:CEDAR 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient Precedence: bulk The message that caused this notification was: To: cypherpunks@toad.com Subject: Letter sent to SJ Mercury staff on CA SJR-29 ... From: Ernest Hua <hua@chromatic.com> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 14:30:38 -0600 Cc: hua@chromatic.com Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 13:26:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Ernest Hua <hua@chromatic.com> To: business@sjmercury.com, computing@sjmercury.com, state@sjmercury.com Subject: Why no coverage of CA resolution on Encryption? Cc: hua@chromatic.com Why was there no coverage of CA State resolution SJR-29? I find it using the search facility at: http://www.sen.ca.gov/www/leginfo/SearchText.html And the result is at: http://www.sen.ca.gov/htbin/ca-billpage/SJR/29/gopher_root2:[bill.curren t.sjr.from0000.sjr0029] The on-line magazine has a full article by Will Rodger on this: http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/daily/970908b.html Apparently there was some attempt by the Clinton Administration to cover up their lobbying effort. I don't understand why the Administration would care about a California state RESOLUTION of all things. Why does the Clinton Administration want to prevent a state legislature from speaking its mind? And what's with this attempt to claim "copyright" on that fax? Please get some answers on this! The US Senate/House will be voting on important encryption legislation in the coming days. The people of this country deserves to have a open, informed, serious discussion of one of the most important privacy issues of the information age. We cannot afford to let a few intelligence and law enforcement agencies dictate policy TO us against our will. Ern