-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Jonathan Wienke wrote:

Woodwose (who appears to have borrowed my last name for his "True Name") appears to have done a variation of this--except that if there are complaints about messages being sent from woodwose@mailexcite.com, I doubt anything will happen other than the woodwose account at mailexcite.com being closed. Hence, his "disposable remailer" claim. Any shmuck can log on and input a fake name, address, and demographic data to create a new account at hotmail, mailexcite, or juno. In this way, as existing remailers are harassed out of existence, new ones can be created on a daily or hourly basis. It would probably be interesting to find out how much info these outfits collect (cookies, etc.) that could be definitively linked to a True Name.

I played around with Hotmail recently, and I didn't pick up any new cookies in my cookies file. The only distinguishing information that Hotmail seems to collect (aside from the demographic info you feed them when you open an account) is the IP address you log in from. A public proxy is sufficient to shield your IP address. I created the account from one IP address and sent the email during a separate session from another IP address. The X-Originating-IP header showed only the second address. I don't know if Hotmail keeps track of all IP addresses that access each account. Question: can anyone suggest some information/studies regarding the security of public proxies? Thanks. Nerthus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBNHJtpeFWwZe05jcJAQElEQf+MbBbTWtbiRnekJ9jIyyaTfDX3s2KV8Qm jGERIyCBF1OcZ1l35ZMm0xGKOCpGAWOBZVs/1zHzgTKB6Pxk0UZIP8+2nRmS4Dqt 7AxXa4zufVl9xVgWirCab86MvmTIrDlOdga8YZKS2h4RzLPPvo/ZySUqgjUzH0g2 y2LzKGv5KqxkgY/rRIg95I9Doqwg0iRsN2ieVXqI9E//+ZByAQpopLIADcDus4Ez UGFl6P1Ix8eLr2DBeg6nLRS84cTJs6MqAiQsHPaKUAHkS72bgv1t5lTxPcMtt6ah NK5bJfs9HEY20RXtN2kASXBkGjAzC2LMNIZ0heqmJRB471AZ4j30lg== =FOsD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----