At 4:20 PM 11/18/94, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

The standard thing in these cases is to say "There are some neat RFC drafts on security in ftp://hostname/names; you might be interested."

At which time someone will go "Gee, what are they about?" The announcement, in my opinion, *is* pointer. What would be unacceptable is the posting of said document with a note saying "Here's something I thought everyone should read"

I have already gotten three other copies of each of the three messages associated with Ran's new IPng drafts because every security mailing list on earth seems to operate on the "just forward everything" premise. More aren't needed.

Were they relavent to each of the lists? I feel they are relavent to this list. You're the one on multiple security lists. Surely it falls on you to cope, not for the list to cope around you. Bob -- Bob Snyder N2KGO MIME, PGP, RIPEM mail accepted snyderra@post.drexel.edu PGP & RIPEM keys on key servers When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.