-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Yet another bad PGP signature via e$pam. Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 12:13:03 +0600 To: cypherpunks@toad.com From: "David K. Merriman" <merriman@arn.net> Subject: Re: Digital postage and remailer abuse That's the third today (although the second was fixable by concatenating the Subject: onto one line.) Would everyone please get into the habit of formatting their messages to be much less than 80 columns? All Phil's travails are ill- rewarded when we can't get basic clearsigning to work via mailing lists. (Or if we don't bother to *use* clearsigning via mailing lists, but that is another topic...) On a related subject, cpunks traffic recently alerted me to how effective replay attacks can be against PGP. Don't PGP signatures include a time-stamp from the system clock? I'm going to get into the habit of including a time-stamp in the clear-text from now on. (I have sent so many PGP-clearsigned messages, and many of them quite short, that an attacker could almost hold up my end of a conversation using them. :-) ) Bryce PGP sig follows  Sat Jan 13 14:48:23 MST 1996 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Auto-signed under Unix with 'BAP' Easy-PGP v1.01 iQCVAwUBMPgoy/WZSllhfG25AQGGlgP9HhxLLpfrsyTBc8ed9jjToJnUOl37S+3z 8zac6FJXk+3dsKhXe2UhiKQrLDx6wIodvy+6DkpBNEEWuzkaVlRkZ9QFiDIuKkm2 ixc8HaZ6yJQLKg5NX19vStpwyQGsDx9tCVAM8BtEYXHuzVqb7AuANVmS/EJWd5js yz+pz6COpxE= =PzVY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----