Illegally canceled articles on Microsoft Security Bugs
(A copy of this message has also been posted to the following newsgroups: alt.security, comp.os.ms-windows.apps.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,alt.religion.scientology,news.admin.net-abuse.misc,comp.protocols.smb,comp.os.ms-windows.advicacy,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Could somebody please tell me who illegally canceled my article <llurch-1510951157410001@tip-mp3-ncs-3.stanford.edu>, referenced in the followup article below, as well as several other articles I posted this morning? It was cross-posted to several groups, but I don't think it should have triggered any spam-cancelers, and I see nothing in news.admin.net-abuse.misc. I'd find the cuplrit myself, but Stanford only saves the last 100 or so messages in control. See the rather prominent blinking link on the Web page below for the other PGP-signed article that was canceled. Thanks in advance. Followups set to news.admin.net-abuse.misc. Don't bother canceling this article, my friend. By the way, the other articles were saved and emailed as well. - -rich jabba@deathstar.stanford.edu and other accounts moderator of a certain list http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~llurch/innocuous/faq.html PGP key available on MIT server and via finger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMIHC9oND7LjhcPQ9AQHTZgQAxGQZGTFDrzUTfyWCuLTUP2VbIp6IwK/Y NJjy7ke4rgZH+bjegb1h2ig/lALEhnX4+uhurhDJ0wq6du2p5V/DUlsNHCcWvotL GHyd/ZLzXGq6OYRoPijUHAdDBPD2wWIdAfsYNiTgv3iezBJL+2cCq/YLiPd22KyF MROQwF05Hoc= =1K2B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- I will be charitable and assume that it was someone else I've pissed off (lord knows there's several), and not someone working directly for Microsoft or the Church [spit] of Scientology, who were both maligned in the canceled posts. In article <petrichDGID4I.5GG@netcom.com>, petrich@netcom.com (Loren Petrich) wrote:
Newsgroups: alt.security,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc Path:
nntp.Stanford.EDU!news.Stanford.EDU!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!petrich
From: petrich@netcom.com (Loren Petrich) Subject: Re: More Microsoft Security Bugs Message-ID: <petrichDGID4I.5GG@netcom.com> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) References: <llurch-1510951157410001@tip-mp3-ncs-3.stanford.edu> Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 21:02:42 GMT X-Original-Newsgroups:
comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,alt.security,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.financial,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.utilities,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.word-proc,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.misc,alt.fan.bill-gates,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.misc
Lines: 9 Sender: petrich@netcom2.netcom.com Xref: nntp.Stanford.EDU alt.security:21764 comp.os.ms-windows.apps.misc:13757 comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc:38436 My favorite example of such a bug is in BOB's password protection. If you mistype it 3 times, it will ask if you want another one. The only defender of this "feature" has been -- get this -- JoanieDearest (at least if memory serves me correctly). -- Loren Petrich Happiness is a fast Macintosh petrich@netcom.com And a fast train Visit my ftp site; its address is (in WWW syntax): ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/pe/petrich
Hi, I would discount the possibility of the cancellations being by a Microsoft employee. I spoke to a very senior Microsoft person who was well aware that security of Microsoft products would be examined and that chances are that bugs would be found. Point being that they would much prefer the to be discovered by people who tell them about the bugs rather than people who aim to exploit them. If you have pissed of the Church of Satan then what do you expect? They will get what is comming to them sooner or later and I expect that it will take judicial and unpleasant form. Phill
participants (2)
-
anonymous@replay.com -
hallam@w3.org