Tim May <tcmay@got.net> writes:

At 4:34 PM -0700 10/21/97, Adam Back wrote:

...

Enciphering minds want to find out how pgp5.0 reacts to this key :-)

(The question is really does pgp5.0 encrypt to the CMR key).

Why not just try to send a message to "phil@pgp.com"?

Surely PGP, Inc. is itself using its own product?

Strangely not. Tom Zerucha asked this question over on open-pgp, and Jon Callas replied: Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com> wrote: : Tom Zerucha <@spam-resistant-email-address> wrote: : : But let me ask a question about PGP, Inc. - Do they use the PGP 5.5 : version with corporate key recovery internally? : : No, we don't. We have no need to. It would be inappropriate for our : environment. Guess that answers that one then.

(I know if I were Jon Seybold and I had a radical"No nukes" nut like Phil on my staff, :-), I'd want to monitor what he was saying to people and what they were saying to him.)

Some fairly hot things by all accounts: all about resistance fighters, and terrorists. Really ought to watch that guy :-) He has a laptop which he carries everywhere too -- probably with his non-CMR old prz@acm.org key on it -- reckon he'll be fiercely hanging on to that one :-) Adam -- Now officially an EAR violation... Have *you* exported RSA today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/ print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<> )]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`