Re: Feds reading this list, Jim Bell, and threats
On Phil Hallam-Baker's rejoinder to Paul Bradley' defense of AP: Virtually all of Phil's charges against AP apply equally well to state-sponsored killing in the natonal interest, including that arranged by highly educated, cultured, philosophical, nuclear physicists and electrical engineers. That's the issue. Who gets to decide who lives and who dies, and how close the killer is to the slaughter, unprotected by law, by public consensus, by popular will, by apologetics for the security of national interest. Jim Bell is hardly the first to articulate this challenge to the grand tradition of the majestic state and its precursors -- the king, the bandit, the tribal bully, the strong -- all sanctioned beasts taking what their trainers want by force, while being excused and celebrated by fey intellectuals and balladeers of all craven submissive dress. Rushdie, hmm. Phil what mind-swill you elbow-tipping? Is Rushie not closer to Jim Bell than he is to you in challenging the arrogant mullahs of highly sophisticated armed thuggery. Who you shillinging for these days, Crispin's bandits of the NLs?
On Fri, Apr 04, 1997 at 01:41:38PM -0500, John Young wrote:
On Phil Hallam-Baker's rejoinder to Paul Bradley' defense of AP: [...]
Rushdie, hmm. Phil what mind-swill you elbow-tipping? Is Rushie not closer to Jim Bell than he is to you in challenging the arrogant mullahs of highly sophisticated armed thuggery. Who you shillinging for these days, Crispin's bandits of the NLs?
Crispin shills for himself, not the NLs or any bandits or anyone else. Phil Hallam-Baker shills for Phil Hallam-Baker. Jim Bell's advocacy of armed thuggery speaks for itself. -- Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited", kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke... PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55 http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html
Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com> writes:
On Fri, Apr 04, 1997 at 01:41:38PM -0500, John Young wrote:
On Phil Hallam-Baker's rejoinder to Paul Bradley' defense of AP: [...]
Rushdie, hmm. Phil what mind-swill you elbow-tipping? Is Rushie not closer to Jim Bell than he is to you in challenging the arrogant mullahs of highly sophisticated armed thuggery. Who you shillinging for these days, Crispin's bandits of the NLs?
Crispin shills for himself, not the NLs or any bandits or anyone else. Phil Hallam-Baker shills for Phil Hallam-Baker. Jim Bell's advocacy of armed thuggery speaks for itself.
-- Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited", kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke... PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55 http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html
I just noticed how when I first called Cocksucker John Gilmore an NSA shill (which he is), some people didnb't know what the fuck it was, but now everyone's accusing everyone else of shilling. How can one donate money to rthe IRA anyway? Hallam baker convinced me to. --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
participants (3)
-
dlv＠bwalk.dm.com -
John Young -
Kent Crispin