At 11:12 7/31/96, Duncan Frissell wrote:

At 02:23 PM 7/30/96 -0400, Richard Martin wrote:

...

Very little that might be new or enlightening to the world; attendees of CFP '96 will remember [fuzzily, in my case] the closest thing to Bruce's counterpart in the states admitting that the USA doesn't actually have much of a counterpart to the privacy commissioner.

Most Central European countries have both privacy commissioners and legal requirements that everyone register their addresses with the police. I'll do without the former if I can also avoid the latter.

I remember a time when Privacy Commissioners were a new thing. Their primary purpose seemed to be to sanction government access to (and keeping of) large databases on the activities of the population. Their secondary purpose was to prevent the private sector competition from doing the same. Eliminating access to such data by the individual in the process. Things may have changed for the better, but I doubt it. -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred. Defeat the Demopublican Unity Party. Vote no on Clinton/Dole in November. Vote Harry Browne for President.