The following anon msg sent to the cpunks list contained your account (ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu) as the reply to: ============================================================ Date: Thu Apr 28 00:36:57 PDT 1994 From: nobody@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu Reply to: ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu To: cypherpunks@toad.com Subject: spooks on cypherpunks NetSurfer <jdwilson@gold.chem.hawaii.edu> Robert Mathews <mathews@gold.chem.hawaii.edu> be aware ============================================================ Are you the sender? Do you know who the sender is? Why exactly is this person defaming my name with this outrageous accusation? The only recent contact I know of was that Robert Mathews sent a message to soda.berkeley.edu where (for whatever his reason was) he was warning against Sameer's 14.4 link. I personally do NOT know why he (Mathews) felt it necessary to send that message on like he did. The only reason I sent it to him was as part of a discussion of bandwidth/services for a network we are working on which will support multiple users and multiple connect types. But in either case, if this was the source of the msg from nobody@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu, it was way off base. -Jim -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.4 mQBNAi2Ig+EAAAECALImsR18LE9I6NKICf8TVhbV6yJgF95ynGHnWnNo1ERfdqzk Zl3Icl2N5klNM3KQ9zM3uN/z55smi2QOiD3hL80ABRO0L0phbWVzIEQuIFdpbHNv biA8amR3aWxzb25AZ29sZC5jaGVtLmhhd2FpaS5lZHU+ =JTj1 -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- ................................ . == = = James D. Wilson. . " " " P. O. Box 15432............................. . " " /\ " Honolulu, HI 96830-5432......Fr. Excelsior........ . \" "/ \" jdwilson@gold.chem.hawaii.edu.FRC/FAM/AASR/GWB/OTO. ...................................................................
The following anon msg sent to the cpunks list contained your account (ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu) as the reply to:
Date: Thu Apr 28 00:36:57 PDT 1994 From: nobody@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu Reply to: ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu To: cypherpunks@toad.com Subject: spooks on cypherpunks
NetSurfer <jdwilson@gold.chem.hawaii.edu> Robert Mathews <mathews@gold.chem.hawaii.edu> be aware
...
Are you the sender? Do you know who the sender is? Why exactly is this person defaming my name with this outrageous accusation?
Cheer up, NetSurfer, as nobody takes anonymous accusations too seriously...at least not anyboy with any common sense. Reputations matter, and anonymous entities who provide no verifiable info (not that many of us want to see such info, or would bother to investigate it) have almost zero reputation. The calculus of reputations thus means that anonymous accusations carry little weight. There's a lot more to be said here. This issue lies close to the heart of how crypto anarchy works. --Tim May -- .......................................................................... Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@netcom.com | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero 408-688-5409 | knowledge, reputations, information markets, W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments. Higher Power: 2^859433 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available. "National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway."
Are you the sender? Do you know who the sender is? Why exactly is this person defaming my name with this outrageous accusation?
Like it says in the header, "Remailed-By: ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu". I remailed it; I did not originate it. No, I do not know who the sender is, and cannot find out. Without belittling your dismay at being called a "spook", I think it's worth noting that nobody has posted to say "Thanks for the hot tip!", while several have said "Yeah, right." This is as it should be in reponse to an unsigned message making unsupported claims. Eli ebrandt@hmc.edu
participants (3)
-
Eli Brandt -
NetSurfer -
tcmay＠netcom.com