Re: Wired Integrity
At 4:35 PM 12/13/1996, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
What is troubling is that it is written by Sandy Sandfort who works at C2Net....
...At the time I wrote and submitted the article I neither worked for Sameer...
Thank you for the clear explanation. Just so you know, I did not doubt your integrity for an instant. Wired should have appended a short paragraph explaining the possible conflict of interest. The Little Green Man
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SANDY SANDFORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C'punks, On Fri, 13 Dec 1996 nobody@cypherpunks.ca wrote:
Wired should have appended a short paragraph explaining the possible conflict of interest.
I agree. It was an editorial decision, of course, but I think it would have been the best course of action. S a n d y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
participants (2)
-
nobody＠cypherpunks.ca -
Sandy Sandfort