Re: overview.htm (fwd)
Nurdane Oksas <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu> writes:
On Mon, 27 Jan 1997, Dale Thorn wrote:
Nurdane Oksas wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 1997, Dale Thorn wrote:
Nurdane Oksas wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 1997, Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
Nurdane Oksas wrote: > i think it's good also to exercise outdoors as well as your > indoor nordictrack machines..sun and air is esp. necessary;
but remember, tanning will kill ya.
Yes it will; Not a fan of tanning myself...it also causes lot of skin problems, have seen women age too soon tanning; we don't go outside naked here in NorthEast...do remember;
The real babes in So. Cal. go to tanning salons. That way the evenly- distributed tan looks best with, say, a pure white bikini. You can go to the beach, of course, and hang out with the hoi polloi, but it's mostly kids with pimples and stuff.
i don't see why she would wear a bikini if she already is tan. She just goes to show off right??? California is know for very beautiful girls ... I like the pale look :)
There are two really major beaches in the L.A. area that I know of. One is Bolsa Chica, several miles long, north of Huntington Beach, which attracts most of the young'uns south of L.A., and Zuma in the northmost points of Malibu, which gets a lot of Valley people (fer sure). To quote the L.A. Weekly of a few years ago, in a "Best of L.A." review, "Why do all those hot young girls go to Zuma? Because that's where all the hot young boys are."
I see.
But the real babes don't go there. They get skates and nifty little costumes and zip up and down the boardwalks in Santa Monica and Pacific Palisades mostly, in case some hot producer/director should happen along.
I see.
Why is a mere "I see" classified as cypherpunks-flames??? Stop picking on girls, Sandy. --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
On Mon, 27 Jan 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
Nurdane Oksas <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu> writes:
On Mon, 27 Jan 1997, Dale Thorn wrote:
Nurdane Oksas wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 1997, Dale Thorn wrote:
Nurdane Oksas wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 1997, Igor Chudov @ home wrote: > Nurdane Oksas wrote: > > i think it's good also to exercise outdoors as well as your > > indoor nordictrack machines..sun and air is esp. necessary;
> but remember, tanning will kill ya.
Yes it will; Not a fan of tanning myself...it also causes lot of skin problems, have seen women age too soon tanning; we don't go outside naked here in NorthEast...do remember;
The real babes in So. Cal. go to tanning salons. That way the evenly- distributed tan looks best with, say, a pure white bikini. You can go to the beach, of course, and hang out with the hoi polloi, but it's mostly kids with pimples and stuff.
i don't see why she would wear a bikini if she already is tan. She just goes to show off right??? California is know for very beautiful girls ... I like the pale look :)
There are two really major beaches in the L.A. area that I know of. One is Bolsa Chica, several miles long, north of Huntington Beach, which attracts most of the young'uns south of L.A., and Zuma in the northmost points of Malibu, which gets a lot of Valley people (fer sure). To quote the L.A. Weekly of a few years ago, in a "Best of L.A." review, "Why do all those hot young girls go to Zuma? Because that's where all the hot young boys are."
I see.
But the real babes don't go there. They get skates and nifty little costumes and zip up and down the boardwalks in Santa Monica and Pacific Palisades mostly, in case some hot producer/director should happen along.
I see.
Why is a mere "I see" classified as cypherpunks-flames??? Stop picking on girls, Sandy.
---
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
It wasn't and I wasn't.
Sandy Sandfort wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
Why is a mere "I see" classified as cypherpunks-flames??? Stop picking on girls, Sandy.
It wasn't and I wasn't.
It was and you did. Sorry, Sandy, but I'm going to have to take off the 'gold star' I put on your chart on Monday, and put on a 'red star'. Toto
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SANDY SANDFORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C'punks, On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Toto wrote:
Sandy Sandfort wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
Why is a mere "I see" classified as cypherpunks-flames??? Stop picking on girls, Sandy.
It wasn't and I wasn't.
It was and you did.
No, I classified it as "spam" and sent it to the list set aside for that, cypherpunks-flames. Several such spams--from members of both sexes--have been treated the same way, so girls were net especially picked on. In any event, no one was "picked on" by that decision. The people in question self-selected themselves by posting spam. Why "spam"? Because of the childish inclusion of pages of no-longer-relevant previous comments. Whether intentional or merely negligent, the net effect is to spam the list. S a n d y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sandy Sandfort wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Toto wrote:
Sandy Sandfort wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
Why is a mere "I see" classified as cypherpunks-flames??? Stop picking on girls, Sandy.
No, I classified it as "spam" and sent it to the list set aside for that, cypherpunks-flames. Several such spams--from members of both sexes--have been treated the same way, so girls were net especially picked on. In any event, no one was "picked on" by that decision. The people in question self-selected themselves by posting spam. Why "spam"? Because of the childish inclusion of pages of no-longer-relevant previous comments. Whether intentional or merely negligent, the net effect is to spam the list.
I hope to God you're paying attention, Toto. You just got a new rule: inclusion of no-longer-relevant comments. Now if you pay close attention from now on, and write these things down, you won't forget. (until there's a new rule, but that's the way these things work).
Dale Thorn wrote:
I hope to God you're paying attention, Toto. You just got a new rule: inclusion of no-longer-relevant comments. Now if you pay close attention from now on, and write these things down, you won't forget. (until there's a new rule, but that's the way these things work).
Of course I'm paying attention. That's why Sandy had to 'double-talk' to explain how his denial that the post was sent to the 'flames' list really meant that it was sent to the 'spam' list, which just happens to be the 'flames' list, except on Thursdays between 2 p.m. and 4 p.m., when it is called the 'shit' list. Toto
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
Nurdane Oksas <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu> writes:
On Mon, 27 Jan 1997, Dale Thorn wrote:
Nurdane Oksas wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 1997, Dale Thorn wrote: But the real babes don't go there. They get skates and nifty little costumes and zip up and down the boardwalks in Santa Monica and Pacific Palisades mostly, in case some hot producer/director should happen along.
I see.
Why is a mere "I see" classified as cypherpunks-flames??? Stop picking on girls, Sandy.
You are now at level 2, Starfighter. You must defend the Federation against the Kodan(sp?) Armada. (There are an infinite number of levels, BTW).
participants (4)
-
Dale Thorn -
dlv＠bwalk.dm.com -
Sandy Sandfort -
Toto