-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <1.5.4.32.19970605134956.008db240@pop.pipeline.com>, on 06/05/97
at 08:49 AM, John Young
In a harshly worded 17-page opinion, Judge William Downes of the U.S. District Court in Denver found that one of the IRS agents, James Dolan, was "grossly negligent" and acted with "reckless disregard" for the law, and that he made three false statements in a sworn declaration.
So why is James Dolan still working for the IRS? Why is he not under enditement for perjury? Oh I forgot Federal Agents are "just a group of humans" so I guess we shouldn't expect the laws of the land to apply to them. - -- - --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html - --------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a Charset: cp850 Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000 iQCVAwUBM5bMt49Co1n+aLhhAQGn0wQAuG0n4ppXx5QdtNQrrcB4drcbkbDkpcdV 0L28z5zWbbidfz2Mq8wS2HLG01NLPd/6NFDF8EYpezBfpGv9O3SIm3WvhbzhvJOP jEVGUZdNVM+RA3gAMzrBMoiEiIrFfaFO/3615dSHPLpa3NWmbf+QDnVRXFIO1Rxp kFttB1pjRjM= =Vx80 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, 5 Jun 1997, William H. Geiger III wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <1.5.4.32.19970605134956.008db240@pop.pipeline.com>, on 06/05/97 at 08:49 AM, John Young
said: In a harshly worded 17-page opinion, Judge William Downes of the U.S. District Court in Denver found that one of the IRS agents, James Dolan, was "grossly negligent" and acted with "reckless disregard" for the law, and that he made three false statements in a sworn declaration.
So why is James Dolan still working for the IRS?
Why is he not under enditement for perjury?
Oh I forgot Federal Agents are "just a group of humans" so I guess we shouldn't expect the laws of the land to apply to them.
The defendant is perfectly able to bring charges in this matter against James Dolan personally. There is precedent in this. If my read of the judge is accurate he is saying, "go after him because he was acting outside his office". I can't remember the exact name of this decision, but I think it was something like "so-and-so vs. 5 unnamed FBI officers". I'm not a lawyer and I'm not sure how one would proceed in this case, but some official anti-IRS group should fund it. Jim Burnes
At 04:59 PM 6/5/97 -0600, Jim Burnes wrote:
The defendant is perfectly able to bring charges in this matter against James Dolan personally. There is precedent in this. If my read of the judge is accurate he is saying, "go after him because he was acting outside his office".
I can't remember the exact name of this decision, but I think it was something like "so-and-so vs. 5 unnamed FBI officers".
It's _Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents_, 403 US 388 (1971), or http://www.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=403&invol=388. -- Greg Broiles | US crypto export control policy in a nutshell: gbroiles@netbox.com | http://www.io.com/~gbroiles | Export jobs, not crypto.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <3.0.2.32.19970605170523.00886470@mail.io.com>, on 06/05/97
at 05:05 PM, Greg Broiles
At 04:59 PM 6/5/97 -0600, Jim Burnes wrote:
The defendant is perfectly able to bring charges in this matter against James Dolan personally. There is precedent in this. If my read of the judge is accurate he is saying, "go after him because he was acting outside his office".
I can't remember the exact name of this decision, but I think it was something like "so-and-so vs. 5 unnamed FBI officers".
It's _Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents_, 403 US 388 (1971), or http://www.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=403&invol=388.
The problem here is that we are talking civil action not criminal prosecution. Both James Dolan and his co-conspiritors should be up on criminal charges and spend a nice long vacation at "club fed". I am sure that the federal appologist on the list will have some excuse why federal agents should be exempt from procecution when they commit felonies against the citizens of this country that they are hired to serve and protect. - -- - --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html - --------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a Charset: cp850 Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000 iQCVAwUBM5eEUY9Co1n+aLhhAQFMsQP+Nt6ArSXM3J2xuk063kQy0AS2L3m6A2X4 X92DlM4AenbiYQX2nLQpxRaXKHJAjg+KVJC6QkT145a+iPVaf95RYIAt8mG5uoDk RwVZDiUfMZT3jEGfu1mESLWkqrqkjydizRH2RU3IjyxLRcZnL5lCUazExGtGPIxt CsVCXjbAToU= =2I3P -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (3)
-
Greg Broiles
-
Jim Burnes
-
William H. Geiger III