~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SANDY SANDFORT Reply to: ssandfort@attmail.com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Punksters, It's nice to see that Detweiler is back on his medications. Let's hope he stays with the program. I have no doubt he is telling the truth when he says he and S.Boxx "are two unique identities." Yes Lance, but are they the same person? I don't think any Cypherpunk will have any objections to his voluntary name certification schemes. On the other hand, most Cypherpunks would probably consider it their *civic duty* to attempt to discover the weaknesses in such protocols. This is called "destructive testing" in industry, and is a time honored technique. Lance, you will be a better writer, and will be taken much more seriously if you, (a) tone down the purple prose, and (b) learn some verbal economy. You write far too much, and say far too little. Repetition is not a substitute for argumentation. S a n d y (who is really just himself) S a n d f o r t
Please send e-mail to: ssandfort@attmail.com <<<<<<