The NSA is more than capable enough to ignore NSA fodder, I would think. If you want to write something that'll get looked at by a human, you'll have to write the kind of thing that's likely to make you the target of an investigation: "Tim, the supplier screwed up--the .5 Kg Pu shipment ain't
Ben, ix-nay on the omb-bay talk! I asked you not to discuss these things on open channels. (But, yes, I did just hear about the BND's seizure of the shipment...our Polish friends are getting sloppy.) On the "Tommy the Tourist" tag lines. To use a netticism, "<shrug>." The modern Net and the modern NSA will not be fooled for any significant amount of time by such naughty words. In fact, I'm sure they now have a set of filters for ignoring such blatant bait. As all readers of Ludlum, Deighton, and Forsythe know, messages would be phrased as things like "Order received, bill to follow," if not in even more obscure code or enciphered. (Enciphering arouses suspicion, of course, so codes are more likely.) --My name is May, _Tim_ May -- .......................................................................... Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@netcom.com | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero 408-688-5409 | knowledge, reputations, information markets, W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments. Higher Power: 2^859433 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available. "National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway."