aba@atlas.ex.ac.uk writes
They were alarmed by the implication that their WWW server now contained PGP code which they did not feel qualified to judge the implications, or correctness of. This prompted the posting to the forum of a rather worried sounding disclaimer by a votelink representative, to the effect that they were abiding by the Prodigy ruling, and so felt unable to remove the offending piece of ITAR breakage, and yet felt rather unconfortable with it's presence.
Interesting reaction, if I understand it rightly... "We're afraid that having less than two tenths of a percent of PGP on our system causes us to violate ITAR, but we're also afraid to remove it because it may constitute 'moderation' of the discussion and thereby open us to liability."