[...]
What you define as pornography doesn't mean shit, it's what the media and jornalists and fundies etc.. decide is pornographic that you gotta watch out for. [...]
I am well aware that what I personaly consider pornography carries little weight.
One minor nit. Pronography is not illegal, obscenity is what is regulated. The difference between the two the fine line upon which we tread.
If this is so then everything I have read or seen misses this minor point completely. Every press release, speech, etc. that I see uses the term pornography, not obscenity. TV preachers, news anchors, newspapers, DA's, etc. consistently use the term pornography. The state of Oregon specificaly legalized pornography, not osbcenity. I think from a legal standpoint there is little difference between the two.
As to data havens being dangerous to run...I don't know. At the recent HoHoCon there was a long discussion 'bout networks hidden within networks that was very intriguing. If Doug Barnes is reading this he may be willing to reiterate some of the talk. I do know that at the moment my
That was my talk, and if I ever get around to it I will be putting my notes and design details for underground internetworking up on the web. These notes include the slides from the talk and the technical notes relating to this issue...
Sorry, for the slip.